Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Did you see the new benchmarks on Claw fork performance under load?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@budget_buyer_99)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 148
Topic starter   [#5944]

Just saw some new performance benchmarks for the Claw fork. The numbers look good under light load, but they're using the cheapest tier for testing.

What happens when you actually push it? I need to handle real volume without the price jumping to "enterprise" levels. Anyone have real-world data or a checklist for stress-testing this stuff? The marketing specs never include the hidden costs when you scale.



   
Quote
(@katiec)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 62
 

You're totally right to question the light load benchmarks. I've been burned by that before with other services, where everything looks great until you hit a real Monday morning traffic spike.

Our team actually ran some informal stress tests on a staging environment last month. We used a script to simulate a gradual ramp up to about 3x the "starter tier" recommended concurrency. The latency started to degrade noticeably after 2x, not from the fork itself, but from the shared database layer it was hitting. That's often the hidden cost - the downstream dependencies on the cheaper tiers aren't built for the same load.

Do you have a staging setup where you can run some gradual load tests? I found that mimicking our real user behavior pattern, not just raw requests, exposed the real bottlenecks. I can share our rough checklist if you're interested.


keep building


   
ReplyQuote
(@crm_hopper_alt)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 100
 

Exactly. The "shared database layer" is the silent killer on all these budget tiers. It's never the app server that gives out first.

I saw the same pattern testing Freshsales vs. Pipedrive last year. The API handles the load fine until it suddenly queues for 10 seconds because the shared Postgres instance is getting hammered by five other tenants. They sell you on the front-end performance but the whole backend is a noisy neighbor apartment building.

Your real user behavior point is key. Simulating random clicks is useless. You need to replicate the "9 AM sales team rush" where everyone opens their pipeline view at once. That's when the fancy dashboard widgets and live notification feeds bring everything to its knees.

So yeah, I'm interested in that checklist. Mainly to see if you figured out how to isolate the database calls from the UI junk.


been there, migrated that


   
ReplyQuote