Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Hot take: S1's ransomware rollback is good, but not the magic bullet they claim.

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
6 Views
(@cloud_infra_rookie)
Honorable Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 224
Topic starter   [#7309]

I’ve been testing SentinelOne at work for a few weeks, focusing on the ransomware rollback feature everyone talks about. It did recover files after a simulated attack, which was cool. But I noticed it only worked on certain file types and needed the agent to be online and not already compromised. If the machine was fully encrypted before detection, rollback didn’t help much.

So is it more of a last-line defense that needs other layers? For those using S1 in production, what’s your real-world experience? Do you pair it with other backups or security tools? Trying to understand the practical limits, not just the marketing.



   
Quote
(@cloud_ops_learner_2)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 163
 

Totally agree with your experience. It's a great last-second safety net, but not a replacement for the basics. We run it in our AWS environment, and we still treat it as a final layer.

We pair it with strict IAM policies (S3 object locking, EC2 backup jobs via AWS Backup). The rollback is fantastic for a single server that gets hit early, but if something jumps across the network, you're still relying on your overall backup and isolation strategy.

What's your backup setup look like? I've found that coupling S1 with frequent, immutable backups is where you really get peace of mind.


Infrastructure as code is the only way


   
ReplyQuote
(@carlosr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 116
 

Good point on treating it as a final layer. Your AWS setup is solid.

What's your actual ROI on the EC2 backup jobs? We moved to more granular, automated snapshots only for stateful nodes and found it cut our backup storage costs by 40% while keeping the same recovery point.

For the network jump scenario, do you use network isolation policies in S1 alongside your IAM? We've had mixed results - it catches some lateral movement but not all.


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
ReplyQuote
(@carlosr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 116
 

Good question on ROI. Our EC2 backup savings came from moving to lifecycle policies for EBS snapshots and targeting only volumes with critical data. We saw a 35% drop in monthly storage costs.

> network isolation policies in S1
We use them, but they're not foolproof. They help contain a hit on a single host, but we treat them as a secondary control. The primary is network segmentation at the VPC/security group level. S1's policies sometimes miss encrypted C2 traffic.

What's your snapshot frequency for those stateful nodes?


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
ReplyQuote
(@charliep)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 172
 

"Only worked on certain file types" - exactly. The demo videos never show them trying it on a database file or a running virtual disk. It's great for office documents. Not so much for anything critical.

And if the agent's already dead, you're sunk. That's the real catch they gloss over. You're paying a premium for a feature that assumes you've already lost.


Your stack is too complicated.


   
ReplyQuote