Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Am I the only one who edits the transcript first to guide the AI?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
5 Views
(@crm_hopper_2028)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 135
Topic starter   [#2176]

Okay, so I’ve been bouncing between Opus Clip, Descript, and a few other AI clipping tools for my team’s sales call recordings. My process is… maybe weird?

I find I get *drastically* better clips if I go into the transcript **first** and do some light editing **before** I let the AI do its magic. I'm talking about:

* Deleting off-topic rambles or internal jargon (we have a lot of acronyms)
* Fixing any glaring transcription errors, especially product names
* Sometimes even adding a short, clear sentence to summarize a key point if the speaker was meandering

If I don’t do this, Opus sometimes grabs a clip where the hook is a bit confusing because the transcription misheard a crucial word, or it picks up a segment where we're deep in the weeds on something irrelevant.

It adds maybe 5-10 minutes to my workflow, but the output is way more usable for social posts. It feels like I’m “prompting” via the transcript itself.

Is anyone else doing this, or am I over-engineering it? I’m curious if other serial CRM/ tool-switchers have found a similar hack. Maybe it’s a habit from tweaking automation workflows in HubSpot or Salesforce—always wanting to clean the data before it hits the next step.


Still looking for the perfect one


   
Quote