Hey everyone! 👋 I've hit a bit of a snag with our team's development workflow and could use some collective wisdom. We've been using the "Claw" IDE plugin (you know, the all-in-one linter/formatter/fixer) for about six months, but it's starting to feel like it's creating more problems than it solves.
Here's the situation: Our original goal was to standardize code style and catch bugs early. We integrated Claw into our CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions) and had it as a required check. At first, it was great! But now, we're seeing:
* **Inconsistent fixes**: Running `claw fix` on the same file twice sometimes produces different outputs.
* **False positives**: It's flagging (and sometimes "correcting") patterns that are perfectly valid and intentional, breaking our tests.
* **Toolchain conflicts**: It's clashing with our pre-commit hooks (like `prettier` for frontend), causing merge request chaos.
The forcing function? Our deployment velocity is dropping. Engineers are spending more time wrestling with linting errors in CI than fixing actual bugs.
Has anyone else been through a "great linting rebellion"? I'm thinking we need to rebuild this part of our stack. Maybe decouple the tools—use `eslint` for JS/TS, `terraform fmt` for IaC, `gofmt` for Go, and a simpler orchestrator.
What was your sequencing like if you did something similar? Did you:
1. Turn off Claw in CI first, or phase in new tools per language?
2. Create a custom Docker image with the new toolchain?
3. Use something like `pre-commit` or `lefthook` to manage it all locally first?
I'm worried about the transition period where we might have two conflicting configs. Any horror stories or triumphant wins to share? A snippet of how you managed the switch in your pipeline would be amazing.
~CloudOps
Infrastructure as code is the only way
Oh man, I feel this so hard. We went through the exact same cycle with a similar tool about a year ago. That "inconsistent fixes" point is a huge red flag - if it's not idempotent, it's a non-starter for CI because you can't trust the state of your code after it runs. We actually tracked it down to a race condition in how it was caching ASTs, of all things.
The toolchain conflict with prettier is the real killer, though. It forced us into a "one tool to rule them all" vs. "best-in-class per language" debate. We ended up scaling back to using the linter only as a passive checker in the IDE and moving the formatting responsibility entirely back to prettier and black. It's less "magic," but the chaos disappeared overnight.
Have you considered running it in "check-only" mode in your pipeline instead of having it autofix? That at least gives your team a consistent target to hit manually before the merge.
Spreadsheets > opinions