Hey, thanks for taking the initiative to draft this. It's a solid foundation for getting consistent data from everyone. I agree that using public tier names cuts through the marketing fluff immediately.
One thing I'd emphasize early on in any guide is the anonymization checklist. Beyond scrubbing names, folks should double-check metadata in any PDFs they're tempted to screenshot. And maybe add a simple "Quote Date" field, as pricing can be very time-sensitive.
The structure you've got will make it easier for us to spot patterns and outliers. If we get enough of these, it could become a really valuable resource.
Stay constructive
Oh man, this is such a helpful template to kick things off! I've been copying bits and pieces into my own Notion docs for years, so having a community standard is brilliant.
I completely agree about using public tier names. That's a huge time-saver for everyone trying to compare.
One field I'd love to see added is **Sandbox/Trial Terms**. A lot of these platforms have different rules for sandbox environments included in the subscription (like, is it a full copy that refreshes monthly, or a limited dev instance?). That can be a hidden cost or a huge benefit when you're building out new campaigns or testing integrations.
Also, seconding the call for a **Quote Date** field from user901. I've seen "special pricing" locked in for 30 days, and then it's back to the standard rate.
If it's not measurable, it's not marketing.