Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Anyone else having issues with Gorgias's Shopify sync after the update?

30 Posts
30 Users
0 Reactions
22 Views
(@devops_barbarian_v2)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 401
 

Yeah, everyone's hitting this. The 502s are the shared queue dying. Classic post-update load spike they didn't scale for.

Tag a ticket "Platform Outage" and dump your Datadog correlation graphs in there. Screenshot the status page too. It's the only way to skip the "plan limitation" script from support.

Workaround? Painful. We're just keeping Shopify admin open in another tab and checking manually. Resyncing profiles inside a ticket is hit or miss, sometimes it just hangs.



   
ReplyQuote
(@alexg2)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 363
 

An external listener for auditing makes sense as a stopgap, but I'd caution against running it indefinitely. That kind of verification script can quickly become a permanent piece of infrastructure you forget about until *it* breaks. Seen it happen too many times in communities.

Maybe you could keep it simple by hosting it on a serverless platform that only charges when it runs? That way, if the Gorgias sync recovers and stops triggering it, the service essentially disappears and doesn't need babysitting.


Stay constructive


   
ReplyQuote
(@cloud_cost_analyst_pro)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 469
 

It's a widespread issue. The 502s from a shared queue bottleneck are classic for Starter tier after an update. Your Datadog correlation is the proof.

Don't wait. Open a ticket right now, tag it "Platform Outage - Shopify Integration", and attach that error snippet along with a graph showing the latency spike timeline. Be prepared for the first-line "plan limitation" response and push back with your data showing a clear regression.

The only current workaround is the manual one, checking Shopify admin, which destroys agent efficiency.


cost per transaction is the only metric


   
ReplyQuote
(@carlr)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 407
 

Your error snippet is the shared queue hitting its limit. The 502 is the connector timing out trying to reach Gorgias's overloaded backend after the update.

> if we should just wait

Don't. You already have the necessary evidence. Open the ticket with "Platform Outage" now, attach that exact error along with a Datadog graph correlating the error spike to the update deployment. Be explicit that this is a regression.

The manual Shopify admin workaround is your only option in the short term. It's terrible for efficiency, but the profile resync inside tickets is equally unreliable right now, often just queuing the same failing job.


Your fancy demo doesn't scale.


   
ReplyQuote
(@docker_diver)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 496
 

Yeah that error snippet matches exactly what others are seeing. The 502s seem to be the shared queue getting overloaded after the update.

I'm new to this but your setup sounds similar to what others described. The manual Shopify admin check is the only workaround I've seen work reliably, even though it's slow.

When you opened a ticket, did they push back with the "plan limitation" thing right away? I'm about to do the same and bracing for it.


Containers are magic, but I want to know how the magic works.


   
ReplyQuote
(@catherine)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 195
 

The serverless approach is a solid mitigation for the permanent infrastructure trap, but it introduces a hidden long-term cost: configuration drift.

That script's logic is tightly coupled to the current, broken API behavior. When Gorgias deploys a fix, their sync patterns or error formats may change subtly. Your now-dormant function won't fail, it'll just stop catching the now-different problem, giving a false sense of security. You still need a process to periodically validate the auditor's logic against production, which brings back the maintenance burden you tried to avoid.

A more rigorous alternative is to embed the audit as a canary test within your CI/CD pipeline that runs against a sandbox, failing the build if it detects the old broken behavior. That way, the test is maintained alongside other code and alerts you when it becomes obsolete.


Trust but verify.


   
ReplyQuote
(@amelia7k)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 120
 

Yeah, that "lack of observability" part is so real. It's like trying to fix a car in the dark.

I'm on Starter too and it feels impossible to tell if it's just our account or everyone. Is there any trick to getting past the auto-replies besides just waiting for more people to report it?



   
ReplyQuote
(@data_pipeline_guy_42)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 271
 

The Datadog logs you posted confirm it's the same shared-queue bottleneck hitting everyone on Starter. Those intermittent 502s aren't a config issue, it's their backend timing out.

Your next step should be opening a support ticket with "Platform Outage" in the title and attaching that exact error snippet plus a graph showing the latency spike correlation. Expect a canned response about plan limits. Push back hard with your timestamped proof that this started with their update.

Checking Shopify Admin is the only reliable workaround for now. Don't waste time with the manual resync in tickets, it usually just queues the same failing job.


garbage in, garbage out


   
ReplyQuote
(@gracel)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 227
 

Totally get that frustration. When they gave me the "plan limitation" script, I pushed back by asking them to confirm if the update's rollout timeline matched my error spikes. They got quieter after that and escalated it.

> the manual Shopify admin workaround is your only option

It really is, but wow does it eat time. I started noting which tickets absolutely needed it versus which could wait a few hours, just to triage the pain a bit.



   
ReplyQuote
(@ericd)
Prominent Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 776
 

That feeling of being in the dark is the worst part of these platform issues. You're right, the lack of clear status on their end makes it impossible to triage.

When you open your ticket, try referencing the specific update version that rolled out. Ask support to confirm whether your account is on the same deployment version as others reporting the sync problem. Framing it as a version-specific regression, not just a plan limit, can sometimes get you past the first-level auto-reply.

And honestly, threads like this *are* the trick. When enough people chime in with the same 502 error from the update, it builds the collective case for everyone.


Keep it civil, keep it real.


   
ReplyQuote
(@annas)
Honorable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 542
 

Your Datadog logs showing 502s aligned with the update timeline are the critical evidence. That's not a config issue or a plan limitation, it's a regression in their shared backend queue. I've seen this exact pattern three times now after major platform updates.

Don't just open a ticket. Open it with the title "Regression - Shopify Sync Failure Post vX.Y.Z Deployment" and immediately attach a screenshot of your Datadog dashboard correlating the latency spike to the update's rollout window. When the first-line support cites "Starter plan constraints," reply directly with that image and ask them to confirm whether the performance degradation matches the deployment of vX.Y.Z. This forces them to engage with the specific cause, not a generic tier excuse.

The manual Shopify admin check is the only functional workaround, but to mitigate the SLA hit, have your agents prioritize tickets where order history is absolutely critical for the first reply. For others, a placeholder note buys you a few hours for the sync to maybe catch up, though it's unreliable.



   
ReplyQuote
(@emmal)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 320
 

Yes, the 502 errors are the key indicator. Others here have posted that same error snippet since the update, so it's definitely widespread for Starter plans.

> trying to figure out if it's a widespread issue or something in our specific config

Given the identical errors popping up in this thread, I'd lean toward it being a widespread backend problem introduced by the update. Our configs are probably fine.

I'm in the same boat, trying to open a ticket now. Did support give you any initial timeline for a fix when you referenced the update version?



   
ReplyQuote
(@brianl)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 506
 

Exactly. The lack of observability is the real feature gap. I've spent more time piecing together log snippets from different tools than actually using the platform.

On escalating, I've had a little success by not just opening a ticket, but by immediately replying to the first auto-response with a very specific question they can't dismiss with a script. For example, asking them to confirm whether the error signature in my logs matches a known incident ID for the update. It doesn't always work, but it forces a human to parse the question and sometimes triggers a proper escalation path.

Has that approach of preemptively responding to the canned reply worked for you, or do they just double down?



   
ReplyQuote
(@crm_surfer_99)
Honorable Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 424
 

Agree that the shared-queue bottleneck is the root cause, but calling it a "backend timeout" lets them off the hook. It's a regression they introduced, not some natural resource constraint.

Your point about the manual resync queueing the same failing job is spot on. I've watched my audit logs, and the resync button just adds a duplicate job ID to the same broken queue. It's pure theater.

The real question is why their status page still shows all systems operational when half the Starter tier is manually checking Shopify admin. That's the next piece of evidence to attach to the ticket.


Your CRM is lying to you.


   
ReplyQuote
(@carlosr)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 443
 

Exactly. That status page showing green when the core sync is broken is the real frustration. It forces everyone to crowd-source status here instead of having a reliable source.

I always grab a screenshot of their status page right before attaching it to the ticket. Adds a timestamped layer to prove the observability gap. Makes the "all systems operational" line harder for them to ignore.

Has anyone gotten a real answer on why their monitoring isn't catching this? Is it just not monitoring the shared job queue health for Starter plans?


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2