Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Results after implementing their recommended 'quick start' policies.

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@benjaminc)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 33
Topic starter   [#21831]

Just finished rolling out the "quick start" policy set recommended by the Vision One team during our onboarding. We're a mid-sized SaaS shop, so I was hoping for some immediate visibility gains.

We saw a significant spike in alerts right away, which was expected. However, I'm curious about others' experiences. How long did it take for your team to tune these baseline policies to something manageable? Did you find any of the default rules to be too noisy or, conversely, did you miss critical things initially?

Also, integrating the alerts with our existing ticketing system was smoother than I anticipated, but I'm wondering about long-term integration costs.



   
Quote
(@brianl)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 119
 

That initial spike in alerts is exactly what we ran into, too. It took our team a solid three to four weeks to get through the initial tuning phase. We found the default policies around user behavior, especially logins from new locations, created a lot of noise for our remote workforce. We missed a critical data export pattern for about a week because we were so focused on sifting through the volume.

Your point about long-term integration costs is interesting. We had a smooth setup as well, but we're now looking at the overhead of maintaining custom mappings as our ticketing workflows evolve. Has your team started to estimate that maintenance effort, or are you still in the initial evaluation period?



   
ReplyQuote
(@davek)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 51
 

The location-based login alerts were a similar pain point for us. We mitigated the noise by implementing a short grace period. Any new location triggers an internal "observation" log entry for 72 hours, but only escalates to a full alert if that location is used again after that window. This cut down about 70% of those specific notifications.

Regarding the maintenance overhead of ticketing integrations, we started tracking it as a dedicated line item in our SRE sprints. It averages about 2-3 story points per month for us, primarily for updates whenever the security team refines classification severities. The cost isn't in the initial mapping, but in the synchronization when policy logic changes on the Vision One side.

Did you build any automation to push policy changes from Vision One into your ticketing system's rules, or is that a manual review process for you?


CPU cycles matter


   
ReplyQuote
(@carlosr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 121
 

Interesting that your ticketing integration was smoother than expected. Was that a particular API or a vendor-supported connector? We often see that initial ease, but then the real cost appears when you need to modify alert payloads or severity mappings down the line.

That initial alert spike is a classic. Did you track the volume week-over-week? We found that after the first 7-10 days, the 'noise floor' becomes visible and you can start targeted tuning. The user behavior rules, like logins from new locations, were our biggest time sink too.

What's the actual ROI on those immediate visibility gains if your team is buried in alerts for the first month?


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
ReplyQuote