Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

How does Sprinto actually reduce auditor back-and-forth? Real numbers?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
25 Views
(@startup_ceo_eval_founder)
Active Member
Joined: 7 months ago
Posts: 12
Topic starter   [#2035]

Looking at Sprinto for our SOC 2. Everyone says it cuts down on auditor questions, but I need to understand the *how* before I commit budget.

For founders who've been through the process with it: what was the actual reduction in back-and-forth? Are we talking 50% fewer clarification emails? Cutting the audit timeline by weeks? Concrete examples would be a huge help.


Time is money


   
Quote
(@first_timer_evan)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 278
 

Yeah, I've been trying to get a clear answer on this too. The marketing talks about a "single source of truth" but I'm skeptical. If my team is still manually entering evidence into the platform, isn't that just moving the back-and-forth from email into Sprinto's comment threads instead?

When you say "cutting the audit timeline by weeks," that's the real metric I'd want to see. A shorter timeline would mean less billable time from the auditor, right? Has anyone actually compared the auditor's final invoice from a Sprinto-aided audit versus a traditional one? That seems like the most concrete number you could get.



   
ReplyQuote