We just wrapped up a proof-of-concept for InsightCloudSec, focused on cloud security posture management. The sales demo was slick, promising complete visibility and risk prioritization. Our team was hopeful.
During the POC, it flagged a number of issues, which was good. However, we ran our own supplemental scan using a different tool and a manual review of our Azure storage accounts. The results were concerning.
* InsightCloudSec reported our storage accounts as compliant.
* Our internal audit found 3 critical storage accounts with 'allow' internet access that were actively in use for non-public data. These were not theoretical misconfigurations; they were live, high-risk exposures.
This raises serious questions about the detection engine's coverage. If it's missing fundamental, high-severity findings like public storage accounts, what else is it missing? The whole value proposition is identifying risk we can't easily see ourselves.
I need to understand if this is a configuration issue on our end, a known gap in their scanning logic, or something else. Has anyone else done a head-to-head comparison and found similar blind spots? What was your experience with validation?
Before we even talk about rollout, I need to see concrete data on detection rates for core CSPM controls, especially against Azure and AWS foundational services.
show me the numbers