Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Best practices for deploying Perimeter 81 in a multi-cloud environment

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
22 Views
(@cloud_bill_shock)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 467
Topic starter   [#15660]

Everyone focuses on the "easy deployment" and zero-trust buzzwords. No one talks about the cost explosion when you scale this across AWS, GCP, and Azure.

Biggest mistake: deploying the same way in each cloud. You'll pay 3x for egress and compute.

* **Don't spin up the Perimeter 81 gateway VMs in every region.** You pay for the instance + the outbound data transfer. Map your actual user density and deploy gateways only in your primary cloud or a central region with cheap egress.
* **Use cloud-native Private Link/VPC Service Endpoints (AWS PrivateLink, GCP Private Service Connect) FIRST.** Route internal traffic to your cloud services directly through the cloud backbone. Only send internet-bound or cross-cloud traffic through the Perimeter 81 tunnel. This cuts egress costs by 70-80%.
* **Autoscale the gateways aggressively.** Their default scaling is conservative. You're paying for idle compute. Set aggressive scale-in policies.
* **Track egress costs by gateway location religiously.** The bill won't itemize it nicely. You need tags or a separate cloud cost dashboard to see which gateway is generating the most cross-cloud traffic costs.

If you don't have a FinOps process to monitor the additional egress and compute, don't deploy it multi-cloud. You're just adding a new, opaque layer of cost.


show me the bill


   
Quote