Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Switched from Netskope to Skyhigh Security - what broke

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@cost_optimizer_elle)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 191
Topic starter   [#24343]

So we pulled the trigger on migrating our CASB/SWG from Netskope to Skyhigh Security (formerly McAfee MVISION Cloud). The business case was solid on paperβ€”better bundle deal with our existing endpoint stack, predictable licensing. I'm the cloud cost witch, so of course I was tracking the bill. The direct savings looked good... until the hidden costs of "what broke" started rolling in.

The technical debt was in the config details we'd forgotten about. Netskope's steering client handled things a certain way, and our shift to Skyhigh's connectors broke two critical workflows:

* **Our serverless CI/CD security scans.** The inline API calls from our builders to external repos assumed a specific TLS inspection passthrough. Skyhigh's default policy blocked them. Took us a week of failed builds to trace it back to a missing custom exception that was just *there* in the old tenant.
* **The "shadow IT" dashboard we built.** We had a scrappy but effective CloudTrail -> S3 -> Lambda flow that used Netskope's API to correlate user activity. Skyhigh's API model is differentβ€”the `GET /events` endpoint uses a different time-window logic and pagination. Our scripts choked. Had to spend 15 engineering hours rewriting and retesting.

```python
# Old Netskope logic (simplified)
response = requests.get(f"{NS_URL}/events", params={'start': start_epoch, 'end': end_epoch})

# New Skyhigh logic required
response = requests.get(f"{SKYHIGH_URL}/events", params={'limit': 1000, 'startTime': start_iso, 'nextPageToken': token})
# And you have to loop for that token. Of course.
```

The real kicker? Our reserved instance commitment tracking. Netskope's app discovery had nicely tagged our forgotten dev RDS instances. Skyhigh's discovery runs on a different schedule and with less granular tags. Missed about $2k/month in commit coverage for two months until my monthly anomaly check flagged it. 🫠

The moral? The switch wasn't about features, but about *undocumented dependencies*. You're not just swapping a vendor; you're replumbing half your security automation. Budget for way more migration buffer time than they tell you.

Anyone else made this jump? How did your automation land? Did you find other config gaps?

- elle


- elle


   
Quote
(@cloud_cost_auditor)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 185
 

I'm a cloud finops contractor, usually in financial services or mid-market tech, and I've seen this exact swap a few times across AWS and Azure shops running hybrid workloads.

* **Actual cost per protected node:** Skyhigh's bundled enterprise agreement often looks 20-30% cheaper on the spreadsheet than Netskope's list. But their charge model for API calls and data egress from their cloud proxies isn't as transparent. I've seen the delta evaporate once you pass 50TB of inspected traffic monthly. Netskope's per-user pricing is painful but at least it's predictable.
* **Deployment and config drift:** Skyhigh's migration tools are decent for standard web traffic policies, but they consistently miss the custom TLS bypass rules and app-specific signatures that Netskope admins bake in over years. Plan for 2-3 weeks of rebuild time for anything beyond basic blocking, not the 3-day cutover the sales deck promises.
* **API and automation readiness:** Netskope's API is a mess but it's a known mess. Their event latency is usually under 90 seconds. Skyhigh's API has better docs but the mandatory 5-minute polling windows and rigid pagination (1k records max per call) break lightweight scripts. Your CloudTrail Lambda example is classic - you'll need to refactor for batch polling, which adds cost.
* **Support and break-fix SLA:** In my experience, Netskope's support is slower to respond but their L2 engineers actually understand multi-cloud traffic flows. Skyhigh's front-line support is faster on the phone but you'll hit a wall on anything involving custom ports or serverless platforms, often requiring a "feature request" that goes nowhere.

I'd only recommend Skyhigh if you're already locked into their ecosystem for endpoint and your team has the bandwidth to rebuild, not just migrate, your security policies and integrations. To make a clean call, tell us the percentage of your traffic that's east-west between cloud services versus user-to-internet, and whether you have a dedicated cloud security engineer or if this is handled by the infra team.


Show me the bill


   
ReplyQuote
(@crusty_pipeline_v2)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 170
 

Yep, that's the hidden config tax. The old policy objects and bypass rules that just live in the old admin console, undocumented.

Your CI/CD breakage is classic. The steering client vs. connector architecture difference kills assumptions about TLS handshakes. We had the same with internal artifact repos. Skyhigh's default app signatures treat a lot of dev traffic as "uncategorized" and block.

> Our scripts choked.

Their API is a different beast. The rate limiting is stricter and, like you said, the pagination token logic will burn you. Had to rewrite our entire compliance audit lambda. The "savings" from the bundle got eaten by a month of platform team hours.


slow pipelines make me cranky


   
ReplyQuote
(@craigs)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 173
 

> The direct savings looked good... until the hidden costs of "what broke" started rolling in.

The bundle deal. Always the bait. I've never seen one where the "predictable licensing" didn't get eaten by consultant hours to fix exactly these kinds of breaks.

Your CI/CD example is just the start. Wait until you need to pull a custom forensics report during an incident and find their API quota is half of what Netskope's was. That's when the real cost hits - when you're blocked and paying for premium support to raise a limit they never mentioned during the sales cycle.


Read the contract


   
ReplyQuote