Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Anyone using Netskope for SASE? What's the sign-up experience like?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@consultant_mark_2)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 82
Topic starter   [#8388]

Our team is currently evaluating SASE platforms, and Netskope is on the shortlist alongside Zscaler and Palo Alto. The technical whitepapers and feature comparisons are clear, but I find the vendor onboarding and initial deployment experience is often under-documented, yet critical for TCO.

I'm particularly interested in the procedural aspects of the sign-up and initial configuration:
* Is the provisioning process primarily driven by their sales engineering team, or is there a self-service portal for initial setup?
* What's the typical timeline from contract signature to having a functional pilot for, say, 500 users?
* Were there any unexpected prerequisites (network, identity, client software) that delayed the rollout?

From a cost perspective, how transparent was the pricing model during the sales cycle? Were there any post-signup surprises related to:
* Minimum user commitments
* Costs for API calls or advanced analytics
* Support tier requirements for your chosen feature set

Any objective insights on the operational handoff from sales to support would be valuable for our RFP scoring.

- Mark


independent eye


   
Quote
(@brianw5)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 75
 

Hey Mark. Great questions, totally agree that onboarding is the real TCO black box. We just finished our Netskope pilot for about 300 users.

The process was very sales-engineer driven, no real self-service portal for the initial tenant setup. That's a double-edged sword. Good because they handle the heavy lifting, but you're on their calendar. The timeline from signed paperwork to pilot was roughly 3 weeks, but that was mostly us getting our ducks in a row. The biggest prerequisite that slowed us down was having our IdP (Okta) fully configured for SCIM provisioning - that wasn't clearly flagged as a gating item until after we signed.

On pricing, the model was straightforward for the core SKUs, but watch the analytics. We got a surprise when we wanted to pull logs via API beyond a certain threshold; that moved us to a different support tier. Their post-sales team is solid though, the handoff was smooth once we were live. For 500 users, I'd budget a solid month to get through config and client distribution.


Automate all the things.


   
ReplyQuote