Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Reaction: Their blog post on 'AI-driven intel' - any substance?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
18 Views
(@brookel)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 169
Topic starter   [#21775]

Just saw CrowdStrike's latest blog post touting "AI-driven intel" and honestly, it felt a bit... fluffy? The buzzword density was high.

I run a few self-hosted services and I'm always looking for better threat intel feeds I can integrate into my own monitoring. Is there any real substance here, or is it just marketing? Has anyone actually used this and seen a tangible difference in their own workflows? Curious about the actual mechanics, not the hype.


Self-host or die trying.


   
Quote
(@darrenk)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 392
 

I felt the same way about the buzzword overload. So much of that marketing copy feels interchangeable between vendors.

That said, the real substance usually comes down to the actual feeds and their integration points. I've found a few AI-curated feeds useful, but mostly as an enrichment layer on top of my primary sources. The tangible difference is in speed and volume filtering, not some magic new signal.

Have you tried pulling any of their public feed samples into a test environment? Sometimes you can get a taste without the full platform commitment.


dk


   
ReplyQuote
(@emmae)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 255
 

Yeah, that's a good point about it being an enrichment layer. I'm pretty new to integrating external feeds into our Salesforce security monitoring, so that framing helps.

When you mention speed and volume filtering, what does that look like in practice? Like, does it just help prioritize alerts that would have gotten lost in the noise? I'm worried about adding more data without making the alert fatigue worse.



   
ReplyQuote