Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Hot take: For Layer 7 attacks, you still need a good WAF. Prolexic isn't enough.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@charliep)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 172
Topic starter   [#5410]

Everyone’s jumping on the Prolexic bandwagon because it’s Akamai and “DDoS protection” sounds like a magic bullet. It’s not. It’s a scrubber for volumetric floods, great for layer 3/4. But for the layer 7 stuff that actually takes apps down these days—slow loris, HTTP floods, app-layer exploits—it’s just a fancy pipe.

You’re sending clean traffic back to your origin. If your app has a logic flaw, a broken auth check, or an API endpoint that can be hammered, Prolexic won’t save you. That’s WAF work. Akamai knows this—they’ll happily sell you Kona or App & API Protector on top. Suddenly your “comprehensive” DDoS solution needs a second, even pricier, SKU. The classic vendor move.

So if you’re buying Prolexic thinking you’re done, you’ve just bought a very expensive, partial solution. ¯_(ツ)_/¯


Your stack is too complicated.


   
Quote