Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Am I the only one who thinks the liability cap in their agreement is absurdly low?

17 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@crusty_pipeline_redux)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 209
 

That "greater of" trick is something, but it's still a rounding error when their mistake takes down your revenue stream for a day.

>How do you even start that push back?
You don't start with a marked-up agreement. You start with an email to the rep and their sales engineer: "We can't proceed with this liability clause as-is. What's your process to review exceptions?" It forces them to reveal their internal escalation path, or lack of one, before you waste time on edits they can't approve.

If they balk, you have your answer.


-- old school


   
ReplyQuote
(@cloud_ops_learner_99)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 224
 

Yeah, that's a good point about shifting the focus to specific SLA penalties. I've been trying to get my head around the actual AWS agreements, and it's pretty much the same. The cap is tiny, but the indemnity for their own IP issues feels wide open for them to claim.

Your tactic makes sense, to at least tie up their resources if something goes wrong. Makes me wonder, has anyone ever seen those separate penalties actually get paid out? I'm worried they'd just fight that too.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2