Everyone's raving about OpenClaw's static analysis, but the default rule set is a noisy mess. Flagging every possible null pointer is great if you enjoy reviewing style guide violations instead of actual logic.
Turns out the "custom training" feature isn't just marketing fluff. You can point it at your team's merged PRs from the last six months. It learns what you actually fix versus what you ignore. Our false positive rate dropped by about 60% after a week of training. Now it mostly catches the dumb stuff we'd actually comment on, like missing error handling in new endpoints.
Still adds to the queue, but at least the comments are relevant. The vendor's own "curated rules" were clearly trained on someone else's codebase.
Your stack is too complicated.