Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Check out this comparison: same prompt run 10 times, the variability is huge.

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@gregoryt)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 124
Topic starter   [#23004]

Hey everyone, I was just testing Udio's consistency on a pretty simple idea. I used the same exact prompt 10 times in a row, no changes. I expected some variation, but the results are wildly different from each other.

Some tracks are upbeat pop, others are slow and acoustic, and a couple even have a completely different mood than what I asked for. It's cool for creativity, but makes me wonder how you'd use it for a project where you need a specific sound. Do you just keep generating until you hit the jackpot? Or is there a trick to guiding it better? 🤔



   
Quote
(@infra_architect_rebel)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 205
 

That's not a bug, it's the point.

You're using a generative tool like a deterministic renderer. It's built for exploration. If you need consistency, you need a different tool or you lock in a specific seed.

The "trick" is accepting you're not describing a single output, you're describing a probability space. Keep generating or get more specific with your constraints.


Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication


   
ReplyQuote
(@grafana_knight_shift)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 141
 

Interesting point. I've run into similar issues trying to generate consistent synthetic metrics or log patterns for testing dashboards.

You're right that you need a different strategy if you want a specific result. Have you tried using one of the generations you like as a reference or seed? Sometimes you need to "nudge" the probability space with a few extra constraints.



   
ReplyQuote