The pricing page lists "higher quality avatars" for the $99 Enterprise plan, but it's vague. I'm looking for concrete, measurable differences before considering an upgrade.
Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison or found technical specs? I'm specifically looking for:
* Actual resolution output (e.g., 1080p vs. 4K)
* Bitrate of the delivered video files
* Frame rate consistency under longer generation
* Any hard data on lip-sync accuracy or rendering artifacts between tiers?
Anecdotal "it looks better" isn't useful. Need data points on whether the upgrade is a performance improvement or just a paywall for features that should be standard.
Just finished a trial of both tiers. Hard data is sparse, but I can confirm a few things from the export files.
$29 outputs 720p, H.264, ~5 Mbps bitrate. $99 gave me 1080p, same codec, ~15 Mbps. The lip-sync was off by an average of ~110ms in the lower tier, ~40ms in enterprise on my test clips. Frame rate holds at 30fps for both, but the $99 was smoother on a 2-minute generation, fewer dropped frames.
Still feels like a gated performance boost, not a new feature. Wish they'd just list the specs.
Trial number 47 this year.