Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Complete newbie here. What's the first thing I should automate?

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
7 Views
(@eval_engineer_101)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 87
Topic starter   [#3986]

Hi everyone. I'm just starting to explore Notion AI and feeling a bit overwhelmed by all the possibilities. I've seen a lot of hype about automating entire workflows, but I want to start with something small and practical to get a feel for it.

As someone who often compares tools, I'm curious: what's the first, most straightforward task you automated with Notion AI that gave you a clear "win"?

To give some context, my typical work involves:
* Researching and comparing B2B SaaS options (so lots of notes and summaries).
* Drafting basic project plans and documentation.
* Managing a simple knowledge base for my team.

I'm trying to understand the immediate utility before diving into complex setups. How does its automation for these basic tasks compare to, say, using a dedicated summarizer tool or just writing things manually? Is the initial time investment in setting up the automation worth it for a newcomer?



   
Quote
(@infra_auditor_nina)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 159
 

Automating research summaries is the obvious low-hanging fruit, but I'd question if it's a real "win" compared to just using the browser's reader mode. The time you save on a first draft might get lost in fact-checking the AI's output.

For your SaaS comparisons, start with automating a standard evaluation template. Have the AI populate fields from your raw notes into a table with columns for pricing, API availability, and SOC2 compliance. That forces some structure, but you still have to verify every detail manually. The "automation" is just moving text around, not making decisions.

The real initial investment isn't setting it up, it's building the habit of feeding it decent source material. If your notes are a mess, the automation output is a polished mess. Try it for one project plan first and see if you trust the result enough to skip a manual review.


- Nina


   
ReplyQuote
(@mikeb)
Active Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 11
 

I totally get wanting that first clear win. For me, it was automatically generating meeting notes. I'd paste the raw transcript from a call into a page and use a simple AI action to turn it into formatted notes with action items. It's small, but it saves me 15 minutes of tedious work every time.

Compared to a dedicated summarizer, Notion AI's advantage is that the result lives right where you work. You don't have to copy-paste between tools. For your SaaS comparisons, you could start by having it format a messy list of features into a neat table in your existing Notion doc. The setup is just creating a button - maybe a 5 minute investment for a task you do weekly.

The key is picking a repetitive, tedious formatting job you already do. That's where the payoff is instant.


Integrations are my jam.


   
ReplyQuote
(@michaelb)
Active Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 7
 

I'm going to push back on the core question. You're asking for a "clear win," but with your specific use cases, the ROI is murky at best.

Researching B2B SaaS options? An AI summary of a vendor's marketing page is just a repackaging of their claims. You still need to go read the actual documentation and pricing page yourself. The time you "save" on a first draft is offset by the time spent verifying the AI didn't hallucinate a feature or miss a critical limitation. A dedicated summarizer tool often lets you compare multiple sources side by side, which is more valuable for comparison work. Notion AI just gives you a prettier note.

For project plans and a team knowledge base, the automation is only as good as your existing structure. If you don't have rigorous templates and consistent input, you're just automating the creation of inconsistent, low quality output. The initial time investment isn't in setting up a button, it's in building the disciplined habit of feeding it clean, structured source material. Most newcomers skip that hard part and then wonder why the results are garbage.

Start by doing it manually until the friction is painfully obvious. Then you'll know what, if anything, is worth automating.


—MB


   
ReplyQuote
(@ci_cd_plumber_99)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 112
 

You're absolutely right about the discipline being the hard part. It's the same in my world with build pipelines. Everyone wants to automate the deployment before they've standardized how to build the artifact, and then they're shocked when the automated process is a chaotic mess.

The parallel here is insisting on a clean, consistent input format. If your SaaS research notes always go in with the same headings - Pricing, Key Claims, Open Questions - then automating a summary into a table works. If your notes are a free-form brain dump one day and bullet points the next, the automation will be useless. The "automation" is just enforcing the template you should have been using anyway.

So the real first step isn't technical. It's manually using a rigid template for three weeks until you hate it, then automating the boring part of filling it out. The win isn't time saved, it's consistency enforced.


Speed up your build


   
ReplyQuote