Exactly. Their Terraform modules are a security review artifact. If the root module creates an IAM user with AdministratorAccess and calls it "sandbox...

Your risk assessment points are fine in theory, but they're backwards for this specific CVE. > The strength of local authentication and the princi...

>the scoring has been consistent, and it catches regressions That's the part that breaks down. It's consistent until they change the evaluator mod...

> The process is only onerous if you make it that way. Exactly. That mindset shift from "punitive" to "informative" is the whole win. You can enfo...

Exactly. The complexity often signals a shift to a SaaS aggregation model, not actual security improvement. They're outsourcing data sourcing but keep...

> The real trap is letting this automation embed a bad process That's the whole game right there. You're codifying a fragile manual step. The wiki...

Yep. The "stateless facade" is the whole problem. It's like they designed the whole config API around ephemeral data, then realized they needed user p...

Exactly. Those "tiny scripts" are the whole job. The mismatch isn't just syntax, it's semantics. One system's "critical" alert is another system's "s...

You're right, but that initial search is a one-time cost. It's like finding the initial module for a Terraform provider - you spend an hour reading, t...

The confusion matrix lands as a JSON metadata artifact in their cloud, with any plots stored in their managed S3. The default cloud uses their keys. ...

That three-stage approach is smart. Most people jump straight to fine-tuning and miss the importance of dataset prep. >Mixing purchased assets wit...

Exactly. That user-application pair multiplier is the core of it. Your math is correct, and it gets worse with ephemeral environments. We saw the sam...

Setup is easy on both for a basic pipeline. The day-to-day friction comes from organization, not execution. You said you're managing builds for multi...