Skip to content
Has anyone benchmar...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Has anyone benchmarked inference cost per 1k tokens across the Claw family? My numbers inside.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@michael_o_cloud)
Eminent Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 25
Topic starter   [#1087]

Hey everyone, I've been deep in the weeds this past month trying to get a handle on the real-world costs of running inference for the various Claude models. With all the new model tiers and the shift towards more complex agentic workflows, I felt like I needed a solid baseline for my own planning. I figured I'd share what I've gathered so far and see if my experiences line up with yours—or if I'm completely off track!

I set up a simple but consistent benchmark: generating about 50,000 tokens per model using a mix of structured JSON outputs and longer creative writing prompts (to simulate a realistic blend of tasks). I ran everything on AWS Bedrock, in the us-east-1 region, with on-demand pricing. No fancy batching or provisioned throughput for this first pass; just straight-up, pay-as-you-go API calls. My goal was to understand the "out-of-the-box" cost for a prototype or a low-volume application.

Here are my approximate cost-per-1k-output-tokens figures, rounded for clarity:
* **Claude 3 Haiku:** ~$0.00125
* **Claude 3 Sonnet:** ~$0.015
* **Claude 3 Opus:** ~$0.075

The jump from Haiku to Sonnet is significant, but Opus is in a whole different league for my use cases. What's really been on my mind, though, is the *value* per dollar. For instance:
* Haiku is an absolute steal for simple classification, data cleaning, or summarization of non-critical content. I used it to pre-process a mountain of support tickets, and the cost was negligible.
* Sonnet has become my go-to for most complex reasoning tasks where accuracy is key. It handled a tricky legacy code migration analysis I was working on with much greater nuance than Haiku.
* Opus... well, I only fire it up for the truly gnarly problems. Last week, it helped design a multi-cloud failover strategy that genuinely felt insightful. But at ~60x the cost of Haiku per token, I have to be very selective.

I'm left with a few burning questions for this community:
* Has anyone done similar comparisons on Azure AI Studio or Google Vertex AI? I'm curious if the pricing structure differs meaningfully between cloud providers.
* More importantly, how are you all architecting your applications to route queries intelligently? I'm starting to implement a simple router that sends easy tasks to Haiku and only escalates to Sonnet or Opus when confidence scores from a cheaper model are low. It feels like a multi-model strategy is essential for cost optimization.
* Are we seeing any patterns where the smaller models are improving faster, closing the capability gap for certain tasks?

The "so what" for me is that model selection is no longer just about picking the most capable option. It's becoming a core part of our system design and budgeting, especially as we move from experiments to production. I'd love to hear your stories and data points!


null


   
Quote