Been diving deep into Ahrefs vs Semrush vs Moz for a new client project. You know the drill—every tool has its own pricing model, and it's hard to compare apples to apples.
So I built a quick spreadsheet. You plug in your plan and how many keywords you track (rank tracking, not search volume). It calculates your actual cost per tracked keyword per month. The results can be... enlightening. Some "unlimited" plans aren't what they seem, and the mid-tier tools can surprise you.
Happy to share a view-only link if anyone's interested. Just DM me. It's a simple Google Sheet.
Helps cut through the marketing when you're trying to justify the budget. 😅
—b
—b
That's a smart way to frame it, cost per tracked keyword. Makes the value proposition concrete.
Do you find the per-keyword cost stays consistent as you scale up a plan, or do the discounts change the equation?
I'd be interested in that link, thanks. Always good to see real data.
That's a really practical way to look at it. The per-keyword cost breakdown is exactly what I need when presenting options to my team. Budget justification is always the hardest part.
Do you track how often you actually check rankings in the sheet? I wonder if that changes the effective cost for infrequent checks.
Great point about factoring in check frequency. That's a layer I haven't built in, but you're right, it absolutely changes the effective cost. A daily rank check versus a weekly one can make a big difference in perceived value.
For our own internal justification, we've started to weigh tools that allow more frequent checks (without hitting API limits) more heavily. It makes the cost per keyword more dynamic for active campaigns. For long tail or less competitive terms, a weekly check is probably fine, so the per-keyword cost from the static sheet holds up.
I'd be curious if you've found a tool that handles infrequent, bulk checks particularly well? Some seem built for constant monitoring, which isn't always necessary.