Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

We switched from Bill.com to Melio. The payables are fine, but the expense side is lacking.

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@gracep)
Trusted Member
Joined: 6 days ago
Posts: 33
Topic starter   [#17909]

We moved our AP off Bill.com last quarter. Melio's payment execution and vendor onboarding are solid. Sync to NetSuite is reliable, with clear transaction IDs. Approval workflows are basic but sufficient.

The problem is employee expenses. The "expense" feature feels like an afterthought.

* No mobile receipt capture worth mentioning. Employees email receipts to a generic inbox, which creates a manual triage step.
* The categorization logic is weak. It doesn't learn from past entries, so every report requires manual GL code assignment.
* No policy enforcement at point-of-entry (e.g., flagging out-of-policy submissions). All checks are post-submission.

We've had to reinstate Expensify for the team. Now we're managing two systems and two reconciliation feeds into NetSuite, which defeats the purpose.

Has anyone else tried using Melio for a combined AP/expense workflow? Did you find a way to make the expense side usable, or did you also end up with a dual-tool setup?

—gp


Data over opinions


   
Quote
(@chrisf)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 106
 

I'm a project manager at a 35-person marketing agency. We run NetSuite and handle AP for about 75 vendors. We went through a similar evaluation and currently have Bill.com for AP *and* expenses in production.

**Target Audience:** Bill.com feels built for SMBs who need *both* sides. Melio's expense module is truly an afterthought; it's built for freelancers or solos who might have a few reimbursements, not a company.
**Real Pricing:** Bill.com's expense module adds about $6/user/month on top of the AP fees. The hidden cost is the setup and policy configuration time, which took us a solid week.
**Integration Effort:** The NetSuite sync for Bill.com expenses was a separate, more involved mapping project than the AP sync. Took our consultant 2-3 days to get it right for our chart of accounts.
**Where Melio Clearly Wins:** If you only need payables, Melio's vendor onboarding and payment speed is simpler and faster. Their flat fee per ACH payment is easier to budget for than Bill.com's percentage-based model for some transactions.
**Where It Breaks:** As you found, Melio on expenses. No mobile app worth using is a dealbreaker for a team. Bill.com's app isn't Expensify-good, but receipt capture and policy flags (like "meal over $50") work at submission.

For a combined AP/expense workflow for a team over 10 people, I have to recommend sticking with Bill.com. If your expenses are truly minimal (like 5 reports a month), you could force Melio, but the dual-system headache isn't worth it. What's your team size and average monthly expense reports? That would make the call clean.


Still learning.


   
ReplyQuote
(@jackd)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 102
 

Your point about the separate mapping project for the Bill.com expense sync is the real kicker. Everyone talks about the per-user fees, but the real bill comes from the consultant hours to make the two systems talk.

You're paying for the privilege of integrating their "unified" platform, which never feels quite unified under the hood. It's the same vendor lock-in play, just with a nicer wrapper. At least with Melio's weak expense module, you know immediately you need a separate tool and can plan for that integration cost from the start.


Just my 2 cents


   
ReplyQuote
(@brianc)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 days ago
Posts: 39
 

You're absolutely right about the integration cost being the hidden bill. It's the consultant's week, not the $6/user, that stings.

But I think the "know immediately" part is key. With Melio, you see the gap on day one of the trial. With platforms that claim to be unified, you often don't hit that integration wall until *after* you've committed to the switch and burned through setup. That's a worse position to be in.

We went with a separate best-of-breed tool for expenses and ate the integration project intentionally. At least the cost was planned.


customer first


   
ReplyQuote
(@davidr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 116
 

Trying to use Melio for a combined workflow is asking for pain. You've already identified the core issue: it's a payment execution engine with an expense module bolted on as a checkbox feature.

The "manual GL code assignment for every report" is the operational killer. It creates a linear time cost per report that scales directly with headcount. You can't fix that with workarounds. The moment you have more than a handful of employees, the administrative drag outweighs any benefit of having a "single" system.

You made the correct call bringing Expensify back. The real question now is whether you can streamline the dual reconciliation into NetSuite. Have you looked at using a simple middleware tool like Zapier or a low-code platform to merge the two feeds (Melio AP, Expensify expenses) into a single staged data set before pushing to NetSuite? It adds another piece, but it consolidates the reconciliation headache to one process instead of two parallel ones.


—davidr


   
ReplyQuote