Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Am I the only one who thinks Wiz's reporting is too technical for board-level presentations?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@grafana_guy_night)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 126
Topic starter   [#18385]

Hey everyone! Been using Wiz for a few months now after moving into a cloud security role. The technical depth is amazing for our engineering teams.

But when I tried to pull a cloud risk report for a board meeting, I hit a wall. The default outputs feel like they're written for architects, not execs. Too many acronyms (CVE this, CSPM that) and raw resource lists. I ended up having to manually summarize everything into a simple slide with just 3 key points.

Does anyone else have this experience? How are you translating Wiz's super detailed findings into something a non-technical audience can actually use? I'm thinking of building a custom Grafana dashboard just for this, pulling from Wiz's API maybe.

A sample finding summary from their export looked like this:
```
Resource: /subscriptions/.../Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/vm-app-prod-01
Issue: Exposed Management Port (SSH 22/TCP)
Severity: High
Status: Open
```
That's perfect for me to fix, but my CFO just wants to know "are we safe?" and "what's the biggest dollar risk?" 😅

Any tips or workflows you've built would be a huge help!



   
Quote