Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Twingate after 18 months in a 300-user org - the good and the bad

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
27 Views
(@ava23)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 435
Topic starter   [#15318]

Alright, let's cut through the marketing fluff. We've been running Twingate for a year and a half now, scaling from a pilot group to our entire ~300 person sales, marketing, and engineering org. The honeymoon phase is over, and the quirks are now features (or annoyances).

Here's the raw, unsweetened take.

**The Good (Where It Actually Delivers)**

* **Zero Trust without the existential dread.** The setup was, admittedly, pretty painless compared to the VPN appliances we were nursing. Getting a resource online is quick. The engineers love that they can grant access to a single dev server without handing over the keys to the kingdom.
* **User experience is mostly a win.** The client is lightweight and "just works" for most non-technical users. No more "which VPN profile am I supposed to use?" tickets. That alone saved our help desk a measurable chunk of time.
* **Pricing is transparent and predictable.** We're on the Business plan. It's per-user, no surprise bandwidth fees or mysterious "enterprise module" add-ons. In the world of SaaS where pricing feels like a shell game, this is refreshingly sane.

**The Bad (Where The Shine Wears Off)**

* **The "Just Use Terraform" Mantra.** Need to do anything moderately complex in bulk? Their support's first response is essentially, "here's our Terraform provider." Great if you have a dedicated DevOps person. Not so great if you're a solo sysadmin trying to manage 50+ connectors and policies. The admin UI feels built for tiny teams, not scaling.
* **Monitoring & Logs are... sparse.** Trying to debug why a specific user can't reach a resource sometimes feels like detective work. The logs are there, but they're not as intuitive or granular as we'd like. You'll spend more time cross-referencing than you should.
* **The "Feature" Treadmill.** They ship updates frequently, which sounds great. But half the time it's minor UI tweaks or niche integrations. The core admin experience and reporting haven't seen the radical improvements we were hoping for. It feels like they're chasing shiny objects sometimes.

**Bottom Line for B2B Orgs Like Ours:**
It's a solid, modern replacement for a traditional VPN. If your goal is to get rid of the VPN hardware and provide a better *user* experience, it's a no-brainer. But if you need deep, granular administrative control, sophisticated auditing, or you don't have an IaC pipeline, you'll hit some walls. It's a product that seems to scale *usage* brilliantly, but scales *administration* reluctantly.

For our sales team accessing Salesforce and Marketo? Perfect.
For our IT team managing it? A mixed bag.

Just my 2 cents


Trust but verify.


   
Quote