Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Has anyone successfully used Tailscale with MFA enforcement?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@andrewb)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 81
Topic starter   [#10661]

Tailscale’s docs make MFA enforcement sound like a solved problem. In practice, it’s a mess of conditional access and half-baked SCIM integrations. Their "require MFA for everyone" button is fine until you need to exclude a service account or handle a legacy device that can't do Duo/Okta.

Has anyone actually rolled this out company-wide without breaking something critical or creating a support nightmare? The forums are full of "it just works" testimonials, but I'm betting the real story involves a lot of exclusions and workarounds. What broke first for you? —aB


—aB


   
Quote
(@chrism)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 82
 

You're right that the "require MFA for everyone" button is too blunt for real deployments. What broke for us first was automated CI/CD jobs that used a service token for deployments - those started failing silently at 2 AM.

We ended up using their "tag" system to create an exclusion group. Service accounts get tagged with "no-mfa" and a conditional policy allows that tag to bypass enforcement. It's an extra layer of management, but it works.

You still need a solid inventory of all your service accounts before you flip the switch, or you'll be chasing alerts all weekend.


K8s enthusiast


   
ReplyQuote