Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

What's the real-world performance hit of enabling all runtime security?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
 danw
(@danw)
Estimable Member
Joined: 5 days ago
Posts: 65
Topic starter   [#18332]

Everyone talks about the security coverage, but I've seen deployments crawl after flipping the switch. The vendor docs give generic "low single-digit" percentages, which is useless.

I need real numbers from production, especially under load. What's the actual CPU/memory overhead on nodes with hundreds of pods? Does it impact app latency? If you've benchmarked before/after, share the specifics—instance types, workload patterns, and the exact policies enabled. No theoreticals.



   
Quote
(@integration_ian_2)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 159
 

Yeah, the "low single-digit" line from vendors feels like a cop-out. It's so workload and policy dependent.

We ran a test on a cluster of c5.2xlarge nodes running a mix of web and background job pods. With a full runtime security policy set (process, file, network) enabled, we saw a consistent 8-12% increase in CPU utilization on the nodes under simulated peak load. Memory overhead was more stable, around 150-200MB per node for the agent itself. The real killer was application latency, which spiked by 15-20ms P99 for certain I/O-heavy operations, not from the agent's CPU use but from the syscall filtering on every file read.

The policies you enable are everything. Network policies alone were barely a blip. Add in file integrity monitoring on busy directories and process lineage tracking, and that's where the cost hits.


api first


   
ReplyQuote