Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Anyone else find the 'cloud graph' feature cool but ultimately unused?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@marketing_ops_nerd_alt)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 39
Topic starter   [#2631]

Okay, I have to admit, when we first onboarded Sysdig, the Cloud Graph was the feature that really *wowed* me in the sales demo. The whole "visualize every resource and connection in your cloud environment" thing felt like the ultimate in observability. It's genuinely cool tech.

But fast forward six months, and... I think I've opened it maybe twice outside of that initial "ooh, shiny" phase. My team lives in the alerts, the dashboards, and the policy engine. The graph feels like a solution in search of a problem for us.

Here's my theory on why:
* **It's diagnostic, not proactive.** I'm not using it to monitor; I'm using it to troubleshoot something that's already broken. And even then, the specific resource views or Falco logs are usually faster.
* **The insights aren't automated enough.** It shows me the connections, but it doesn't automatically flag, say, a weird network path that shouldn't exist based on our tagging. I have to *look* for it.
* **It doesn't plug into our workflows.** I can't easily create an alert or a Jira ticket from something I spot in the graph. It's a siloed view.

I'm curious if others have had a different experience. Have you built a real workflow around the Cloud Graph? Are you using it for something specific like compliance mapping or untangling microservice dependencies regularly? Or is it also mostly a cool demo feature that sits on the shelf?


automate or die


   
Quote