Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Beginner: Which data sources should I onboard first for maximum ES value?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@crm_hopper_2027)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 198
Topic starter   [#24623]

Alright, let’s cut through the usual vendor advice. I’ve watched three different “security maturity” frameworks crumble under their own weight in as many years, so I’ll give you the actual on-the-ground, tactical view. You want maximum ES value *fast*? That means generating actionable security insights, not just filling a data lake with pretty logs that make an auditor smile.

Forget the “onboard everything” mantra. That’s a fantastic way to drown your team in noise and burn budget on licensing before you prove any ROI. You need a layered approach that builds visibility from the inside out.

Here’s the pragmatic, phased onboarding list I’d enforce:

* **Phase 1: The Absolute Foundation (Your "Crown Jewels")**
* **Active Directory / Windows Security Events (via Windows Event Logs).** Start with 4688 (process creation), 4624/4625 (successful/failed logons), 4776 (NTLM authentication). This is non-negotiable. You’ll see lateral movement, brute force attempts, and credential abuse here first.
* **Your Primary Endpoint Solution (CrowdStrike, Defender for Endpoint, etc.).** Onboard the detection events, not just the health data. The correlation between a weird process on a host (from your EDR) and a suspicious logon from an unknown location (from AD) is where ES starts to earn its keep.
* **Network Proxy & Firewall Denies.** Squid, Zscaler, Palo Alto, Fortinet. Denied outbound connections and blocked inbound attempts are your first line of visibility into compromise and reconnaissance. Cheap, noisy, but incredibly valuable for building a baseline.

* **Phase 2: Expanding the Attack Surface (The "How Did They Get In?")**
* **VPN Authentication Logs.** Any failed MFA, logins from unusual geographies, or simultaneous logins for the same account. This ties directly to your Phase 1 AD events.
* **DNS Query Logs.** Often overlooked. Look for beaconing, domain generation algorithm (DGA) patterns, and queries to known-bad domains. It’s a lightweight data source that provides massive investigative value.
* **Email Security Gateway (Mimecast, Proofpoint, etc.).** Focus on delivered messages that were later deemed malicious, URL click-through events, and impersonation attempts. The human element is always the weakest link.

* **Phase 3: The Hunt Layer (The "What Are They Doing?")**
* **Cloud Provider Audit Trails (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Activity Logs).** Start with IAM events, security group changes, and unusual instance launches. The console login events are your new "network logon."
* **Critical Application Logs.** Your ERP, finance, or source code management system. Look for bulk exports, permission changes, and access from unexpected users. This is where business logic meets security.

The contrarian take here: **Do not onboard syslog from every network device on day one.** Do not start with full packet capture. You’ll spend months parsing data and building dashboards that tell you nothing you couldn’t get from the proxy and firewall denies. The goal is to create *correlation* across a few high-fidelity sources, not to achieve "compliance coverage."

Start with Phase 1. Build your notable event dashboards, tune the correlation searches, and get your SOC using them for actual tier-1 triage. Then, and only then, layer in Phase 2. You’ll find that 80% of your initial detections come from 20% of your data sources. The rest is just context for your analysts once they have a lead.

I’ve seen teams burn a year and a quarter-million in licensing fees before they realized their beautifully normalized DHCP logs were utterly useless for stopping an active ransomware campaign. Don’t be that team.



   
Quote
(@brandonj)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 107
 

Totally agree on starting with the crown jewels, especially the specific Windows Event IDs you called out. That focus is everything.

I'd just add that for the endpoint solution, prioritizing process execution and network connection events over simple heartbeat data gives you that correlation immediately. It turns a generic alert into a story.


—b


   
ReplyQuote