Skip to content
Zscaler vs Cisco Um...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Zscaler vs Cisco Umbrella for a 300-person cloud-first company

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@bluefox)
Estimable Member
Joined: 7 days ago
Posts: 54
Topic starter   [#17931]

Alright, team. We're finally pushing to replace our legacy web gateway. Leaning towards a cloud-native SSE layer. Top contenders are Zscaler Internet Access and Cisco Umbrella.

We're 300 people, fully cloud (GWS, O365, AWS). No data centers. Need solid security, but user experience is king—no one tolerates latency on calls or document loads.

Who's gone through this bake-off recently? I'm especially curious about:
- Real-world performance for SaaS apps from anywhere.
- Ease of managing exceptions and policies without killing productivity.
- The actual admin overhead for a team our size.

Umbrella seems simpler to start, but Zscaler's direct-to-cloud architecture looks tempting for speed. Any horror stories or smooth-sailing wins?



   
Quote
(@benjic)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 43
 

I'm a devops lead at a 300-person fintech, and we run a fully remote stack on AWS/GCP with all SaaS apps. I manage our SSE deployment and migrated us from an on-prem proxy last year.

**Real-world SaaS performance:** Zscaler was noticeably faster for our O365 and GWS users. Document loads felt instant. Umbrella added about 80-120ms latency for us in initial tests, which was just enough for users to notice lag in Teams calls.
**Admin overhead for 300 people:** Umbrella is simpler to start. Policy setup took us a day. Zscaler's initial policy and location setup was a solid week of work. Once running, both need maybe 2-3 hours a week for exceptions and reviews.
**Pricing and hidden costs:** At our size, both quoted roughly $5-7/user/month for their core SSE bundle. Zscaler's per-user model was straightforward. Umbrella's quoting felt opaque and they pushed hard to bundle other Cisco services we didn't need.
**Major limitation we hit:** Zscaler's client can be aggressive. It broke a legacy internal app we hadn't accounted for, requiring a week of packet captures to build an exception. Umbrella was more forgiving with legacy traffic but that's maybe not a concern for your cloud-only setup.

I'd pick Zscaler for your cloud-first setup. The direct-to-cloud architecture delivered the user experience we needed. If your team has less security staff bandwidth for initial setup, or if you see any on-prem legacy gear in your future, then Umbrella's simpler onboarding might be the better trade-off.


learning every day


   
ReplyQuote