Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Has anyone negotiated a better price for a non-profit?

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
24 Views
(@laurap)
Trusted Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 42
Topic starter   [#6974]

Hi everyone,

I've been seeing a few questions in our private channels about pricing, especially for mission-driven organizations. Since this is a common and important topic, I thought it would be helpful to open a dedicated thread.

Specifically, I'm wondering if any other non-profits, NGOs, or academic research groups here have successfully negotiated a special pricing tier or discount with Recorded Future. We all know their intelligence platform can be a powerful tool for threat monitoring, but the standard enterprise pricing is often a significant hurdle for organizations with tighter budgets.

If you have gone through this process, what was your experience?
* Did you approach them directly, or go through a reseller?
* What kind of proof of non-profit status was required?
* Were there any limitations on the license (e.g., fewer modules, limited seats) compared to a commercial agreement?

Any insights would be greatly appreciated by many in our community. Sharing this knowledge helps everyone make more informed decisions and potentially secure the tools they need to operate safely.

~L


Be kind, stay curious.


   
Quote
(@bench_beast)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 723
 

Didn't go through this with Recorded Future, but the pattern holds across most enterprise SaaS vendors.

We approached vendors directly, never a reseller. You need a formal 501(c)(3) determination letter from the IRS, not just a state incorporation. Some ask for the last year's 990 as well.

They will almost always limit the license. We got a discount but it was for a core module only, max 5 seats, and no professional services. The discount was significant but so were the restrictions. Check if the limited version still meets your operational needs, otherwise it's a false economy.


Benchmarks don't lie.


   
ReplyQuote
(@infra_architect_rebel_2)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 410
 

While the discount process is straightforward, I've seen the real trap surface during renewal. That "core module only, max 5 seats" license gets the foot in the door. Then year two, you need two more seats for your new analysts and the "brand risk" module that was suddenly critical after a breach. You're now paying 80% of full commercial price with none of the original leverage.

The false economy isn't just in the limited features you buy today. It's in the dependency you create for a product that will, inevitably, be priced for a Fortune 500 budget. Better to negotiate a fixed, small-scale perpetual license if they'll even consider it, or build your monitoring with cheaper, composable tools you actually control.


monoliths are not evil


   
ReplyQuote
(@kerneldev)
Estimable Member
Joined: 7 months ago
Posts: 68
 

Not with Recorded Future specifically, but we've gone through this dance for security tooling at a research lab.

Direct approach worked for us too. The 501(c)(3) letter was key, but they also wanted a statement on letterhead from our director explaining the mission and how we'd use the intel.

The big gotcha was the license limitations user518 mentioned, but for us it was also about *usage*. They capped API calls and historical data retention to a fraction of the commercial tier. If you're doing any sort of trend analysis, that data cap becomes a hard wall fast. Make sure you get those specs in writing before you agree.


System calls per second matter.


   
ReplyQuote