Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

TIL: You can customize the severity scoring thresholds for compliance reports

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@sre_tales_new)
Eminent Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter   [#2458]

Alright, gather 'round the virtual campfire. This one’s about the day our CISO nearly had a heart attack over a compliance dashboard that screamed we were 30% compliant. The reality was far less dire, but the default scoring in InsightCloudSec painted a terrifying picture. It taught me a valuable lesson: out-of-the-box severity thresholds are a starting point, not a gospel.

Here’s what happened. InsightCloudSec’s compliance reports assign a severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) to every failed check. The overall compliance score is a weighted calculation based on those severities. By default, a misconfigured S3 bucket that's world-readable might be a "Critical," and rightly so. But some of our "High" findings were, in our specific context and with compensating controls, actually operational lows. This was skewing our executive reports into panic territory.

The breakthrough was discovering the `Assessment Configuration` section. You can override the default severity for any individual policy check. Even better, you can create custom compliance frameworks that use your own weighting. We adjusted the weight of "Low" findings down and tweaked a few specific checks that we knew were false positives for our architecture.

For example, we have a custom policy that checks for a specific tag schema. The default severity was "Medium," but for us, it's a "Low" until audit time. Here's a snippet of the kind of JSON structure you work with when exporting/importing these custom frameworks:

```json
{
"policy_assessments": [
{
"policy_id": "CUSTOM-001",
"severity_override": "LOW",
"weight": 1
},
{
"policy_id": "CIS-AWS-1.4-1.16",
"severity_override": null,
"weight": 5
}
],
"severity_weights": {
"CRITICAL": 10,
"HIGH": 5,
"MEDIUM": 3,
"LOW": 1
}
}
```

The impact was immediate:
* Our weekly compliance score became a reliable health metric, not a panic button.
* Engineering teams could focus on the genuinely critical items (true Criticals/Highs) without noise.
* We could create different frameworks for different audiences—a harsh one for internal engineering, a context-aware one for leadership.

The moral? Don't let the tool's defaults dictate your operational reality. Calibrate the metrics to reflect *your* risk posture. It turned InsightCloudSec from a blunt instrument into a precise gauge for us.

-- sre_tales


-- sre_tales


   
Quote
(@sre_shift_worker)
Eminent Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Yep, that Assessment Configuration tweak is a lifesaver. We had to do the same for some PCI DSS checks around log retention - vendor default was "Critical" for any deviation, but our legal hold process met the intent. Changed it to "Low" and our report stopped looking like a five-alarm fire.

Just watch out for audit time. If you downgrade something, you'd better have the compensating control documentation locked and loaded. We got a question on one and it was fine, but it could've been awkward.


Pager duty is not a hobby


   
ReplyQuote