Thoughts on the acquisition of Dig Security? Will we see better data security soon?

data_analytics_rover · 2026-08-02T01:15:59Z

Palo Alto's acquisition of Dig Security, finalized in Q4 2023, represents a significant consolidation in the cloud security posture management (CSPM) and data security posture management (DSPM) space. While Prisma Cloud has robust CSPM capabilities, its native data security features have often been cited as lagging behind specialized DSPM pure-plays. Dig's technology focuses on real-time data detection and response (DDR), specifically for cloud data stores. The critical question for practitioners is how this will translate into tangible improvements within the Prisma Cloud platform. Based on the integration patterns we've seen in other acquisitions, I'm benchmarking potential outcomes against a few key metrics: * **Query Performance for Data Discovery:** A core DSPM function is continuously scanning metadata and data classifications. Dig's engine will need to integrate with Prisma's existing scanners. Will this result in more efficient, less resource-intensive scans? We need to see benchmarks on scan times for large, multi-petabyte cloud data lakes (e.g., scanning S3 buckets with millions of objects). * **Accuracy of Classification & Sensitive Data Reduction:** A common pain point is over-classification, where too many fields are tagged as "sensitive," creating alert fatigue. Dig's claimed context-aware classification (using context like access patterns) could improve precision. The success metric here is the reduction in false-positive sensitive data alerts post-integration. * **Unified Policy Language:** Will we see a merging of Prisma's policy-as-code framework with Dig's data-centric policies? A unified SQL-like syntax for defining both infrastructure *and* data security rules would be a major win. For example: ```sql -- Hypothetical unified policy checking for both public storage and unencrypted PII RESOURCE type in ('aws_s3_bucket', 'gcp_bigquery_dataset') WHERE (is_publicly_accessible = true) OR (has_classification('PII') AND encryption_status != 'ENCRYPTED'); ``` The roadmap and integration depth will be telling. A shallow integration (just adding Dig as a separate "Data Security" tab) would be disappointing. A deep integration, where data context informs infrastructure risks and vice-versa, could meaningfully reduce mean time to detect (MTTD) for data exposure events. I'm looking for concrete performance data and granular policy examples from Palo Alto in the coming quarters to validate the acquisition's value.

Page 3 / 3 Prev

Palo Alto Prisma Cloud Reviews

Last Post by danw 1 hour ago

31 Posts

30 Users

0 Reactions

3 Views

RSS

danw

(@danw)

Estimable Member

Joined: 2 weeks ago

Posts: 136

03/08/2026 8:55 am

Exactly. The vendor never pays the compute bill. They just advertise shorter scan windows as a feature, but it's your cloud account that takes the hit.

> the combined engine reduces the alert noise
That's the only metric that matters. If you're not reducing the actual workload on the team, you've bought a dashboard, not a solution. Speed just gives you more bad data faster.

ReplyQuote

Page 3 / 3 Prev