Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

TIL: You can use Ping APIs to disable unused accounts automatically

24 Posts
23 Users
0 Reactions
41 Views
(@cloud_ops_learner_99)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 495
 

Yeah, the "deactivated account X" log line is the worst for debugging. We started adding the logic inputs after a script deactivated a whole service account team. We had to grep through a dozen systems to figure out why.

Your circuit breaker idea is good. Do you have a pattern for that in code, like a simple counter in the script itself?



   
ReplyQuote
(@claraj)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 342
 

A simple counter is a start, but it's reactionary. The real failure is missing the rule's own degradation. You should be alerting when the *proportion* of triggered actions changes sharply, not just the count.

A counter won't save you when the script deactivates 5% more accounts because your login event pipeline started dropping events. That's the silent drift you should code for.


Prove it


   
ReplyQuote
(@ethanv)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 429
 

That's the sneaky one, right? The proportion alert is good, but you still need a baseline.

If your total user count grows 10% month-over-month but the deactivations stay flat, that's also drift. The script is deactivating a smaller percentage of the population, which means your threshold might be getting stale. It's not just looking for spikes, it's monitoring that ratio against expected growth.

We set up a dashboard that tracks three things together: raw count, percentage of total, and the standard deviation of the weekly percentage. The third one catches that gradual creep.


Ship fast, measure faster.


   
ReplyQuote
(@amandap)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 173
 

That's a really good point about proportion. We're just starting with this and I can see how we'd miss it.

If my script starts deactivating way fewer accounts than expected, is that a success or a problem? How do you tell the difference between "we cleaned up the backlog" and "the data feed broke"?

Do you just set a floor threshold? Like, alert if deactivations fall below 2% of the user base?



   
ReplyQuote
(@chloek4)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 303
 

You're totally right about the tangled logic being the real debt. Swapping an API endpoint is maybe a day's work. Rebuilding a flawed "unused" definition, especially if it's been baked into reports and compliance audits, is a multi-week nightmare.

It's funny, you often find this logic scattered across scripts and spreadsheets, not in a single config file. Someone tweaks a threshold in a cron job comment, another team adjusts the grace period in a dashboard query, and suddenly your "source of truth" is in five places.


Webhooks or bust.


   
ReplyQuote
(@chloeh)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 190
 

You're spot on about the auditing. I've seen teams log the deactivation but not the 'why,' which makes it impossible to untangle later.

We solved this by having the script emit the full decision context - last login, the threshold used, even the source of that data - to our security log. It's a few extra lines of code that saves hours of panic when you get that inevitable "why was my account turned off?" ticket.

Without that audit trail, you're just hoping your logic stays perfect forever. And when has that ever happened in tech? 😅



   
ReplyQuote
(@gracyj)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 282
 

Yeah, that vendor lock-in worry is real. The bigger debt isn't the API calls though, it's that 'unused' logic getting baked into everything. You end up with the same flawed assumptions replicated in reports and dashboards, long after you've ditched Ping.

You're so right about the silent breakage too. We ended up adding a circuit breaker to our automation - if it tries to disable more than, say, 5% of flagged accounts in one run, it halts and pages us. It's saved us from a few bad data feeds.


Happy customers, happy life.


   
ReplyQuote
(@elizabethb)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 183
 

Exactly. That "unused" definition is the poison. Everyone cargo-cults it from the vendor's docs, then spends years working around its flaws. A 5% circuit breaker is clever, but it's just treating the symptom after you've already ingested the bad logic.

What's the threshold for "unused"? 90 days? 30? Who decided that? The vendor's default becomes your company policy, baked into a dozen places. Good luck changing it later when the compliance team cites your own dashboard.


—EB


   
ReplyQuote
(@integration_ian_3)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 411
 

Oh, the service account team incident must have been a rough day. Been there.

For a simple counter, we usually wrap the actual API call in a function that increments a variable, then bail if we hit a limit. Something like this in our scripts:

```python
deactivation_count = 0
MAX_DEACTIVATIONS = 50

for account in candidate_list:
if deactivation_count >= MAX_DEACTIVATIONS:
send_alert("Circuit breaker tripped!")
break
# ... your logic to check if account is unused ...
deactivate_account(account['id'])
deactivation_count += 1
```

But the tricky part is deciding where to reset that counter. Do you reset it daily? Per run? That's where you can get burned if your script runs more often than expected.


Integration Ian


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2