Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

My results after tuning: Dropped threat prevention latency by 70%.

18 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
13 Views
(@benchmark_bob_43)
Reputable Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 243
 

You're not wrong about stale data. I've run the numbers on a few of those SaaS discovery feeds, and they often have a 40-50% false positive rate on "active" endpoints if you just naively ingest them. The noise *will* kill your latency gains.

The trick is to filter the feed with actual flow logs. We cross-reference the vendor list against our perimeter telemetry from the last 30 days. If a subdomain in the "sanctioned" list hasn't seen a single packet, it gets pruned automatically. Turns a thousand-entry list into maybe two hundred real ones.

It adds a step, but you're right, without it you're just automating a mess.



   
ReplyQuote
(@amyl)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 308
 

The parallel to SaaS migration pilot groups is a smart one. It's the same philosophy: you reduce friction for a known-good segment to prove the process works, then expand the controls as you learn.

I've found that automation is only as good as the source data, though. Relying on a SaaS discovery feed for the bypass list can backfire if that feed includes deprecated vendor endpoints or personal apps teams forgot about. It creates a false sense of security. You almost need a second layer of validation, like cross-referencing with actual network flow data, to prune the list down to what's truly active and sanctioned.

How do you validate the entries in your automated feed?


Reviews build trust.


   
ReplyQuote
(@backend_builder)
Prominent Member
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 605
 

Spot on about the source data validation. We had the same issue - our initial feed was full of legacy API subdomains that generated zero traffic.

Our validation layer is a simple Python service that pulls from both the discovery feed and our NetFlow data. It only keeps entries that have seen at least one successful connection in the last 14 days. The pruning logic is straightforward, but you need to watch the thresholds.

If you set the activity window too short, you might prune legitimate but infrequently used services. We found 14 days gave us a good balance between freshness and not breaking things.

The real trick is handling new, legitimate entries that *haven't* generated flow logs yet. For that, we maintain a small manual allowlist that bypasses the validation check for a 30-day grace period.


Latency is the enemy, but consistency is the goal.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2