Hey everyone, first time posting here. I'm the new SRE on the night shift, and I've been thrown into the deep end with our cloud security posture management. We use Orca Security.
Our compliance team just flagged us because they say Orca's vulnerability and compliance reports lack the "forensic detail" they need for audits. They're used to super granular, traditional scanner outputs and want things like exact file paths for misconfigurations, full historical timelines of a finding, and more step-by-step evidence.
From my console, I see the alerts and the high-level "here's the issue and here's the resource," which is great for us to *fix* things fast. But when I generate the PDF reports for compliance, it feels like it's summarizing for an engineering audience, not an auditor.
Has anyone else run into this? I'm trying to bridge the gap between teams and I'm a bit overwhelmed.
* Are we just not using the right report templates or export options?
* Is there a way to drill down in Orca to get that level of detail (like a specific config line in a cloud asset) that I'm missing?
* Or is this a known thing, and do you pair Orca with something else to satisfy the compliance folks?
I really don't want to have to manually gather all that extra evidence every time 😅. Any advice from teams who've been through this would be a lifesaver.