Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Complete newbie here - where do I start with Sentinel if my team only knows Splunk?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@elliotk)
Trusted Member
Joined: 6 days ago
Posts: 51
Topic starter   [#13565]

Hey everyone! So, my team is deep in the Splunk ecosystem—we've built dashboards, saved searches, the whole nine yards—but management is pushing us hard toward Microsoft Sentinel. I’ll admit, the Azure integration and potential cost savings have my curiosity piqued, but the mental shift feels massive. We're all complete newbies to Sentinel, and the Azure portal is... a lot.

I'm the kind of person who learns by mapping new tools onto what I already know. So my first question is: **where do we even start?** Is there a direct conceptual bridge from Splunk's way of doing things?

For instance:
* In Splunk, we live by indexes, sourcetypes, and source. What's the Sentinel equivalent? Is it all about Log Analytics Workspaces and Tables?
* Our alerting is built on saved searches with cron schedules. I've heard Sentinel uses **Analytics Rules**—are they fundamentally similar, or is it a different paradigm?
* Searches! SPL is second nature. **KQL** (Kusto Query Language) looks familiar but trips us up on syntax. Are there any good "SPL to KQL" cheat sheets or mental models you've found?
* Dashboards and visualizations: We love Splunk's classic dashboards. Is Sentinel's workbooks feature the go-to, and how flexible is it for building operational views?

Beyond the concepts, I'm really worried about the operational workflow. In Splunk, we onboard data via forwarders or heavy forwarders. With Sentinel, it seems like it's all about connectors and agents (like the Log Analytics agent or the AMA). The Azure-native resources seem straightforward, but what about our on-prem Linux boxes or network appliances that currently send syslog to a Splunk forwarder? What's the most straightforward path for those?

Finally, the pricing model makes my head spin compared to our Splunk license. I get that it's based on ingestion volume in the Log Analytics workspace, but:
* Does analyzing that data in Sentinel itself incur *additional* costs on top of the ingestion?
* Any gotchas with data retention or types of data that are unexpectedly expensive?

I'm ready to roll up my sleeves and start a POC, but I want to avoid the classic pitfall of trying to force Sentinel to *be* Splunk. Would love to hear from anyone who's made this journey—what was your first "aha" moment, and what was your biggest stumbling block? 🛠️

Maybe we can even compare equivalent setups side-by-side?



   
Quote
(@jakes)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 74
 

First, forget the cost savings hype until you see your own bill. Ingest and retention pricing in Log Analytics is a different beast.

>Is there a direct conceptual bridge

Yes, but the friction is high. Your mapping is mostly right:
* Index/Sourcetype/Source becomes Workspace/Table (like `SecurityEvent`)/specific ingestion method.
* Saved search alerts become Analytics Rules. The paradigm is similar, but the query logic is KQL.
* Dashboards become Workbooks. They're more flexible but also more complex to build.

On KQL vs SPL: don't look for a 1:1 cheat sheet. The mental shift is from pipelines to sequenced operators. Start by running basic queries in Log Analytics, not Sentinel directly, to get the feel.

Biggest piece of advice: run a parallel proof of concept. Keep Splunk running and send a subset of data to Sentinel. Build one of your critical alerts and a dashboard there. You'll learn the real differences fast.


Show me the methodology.


   
ReplyQuote