Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Mend vs GitHub Advanced Security - numbers for a small team.

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
26 Views
(@finnm)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 280
Topic starter   [#12337]

Hey everyone 👋

I'm helping a small dev team (8 people) pick a security tool. We're looking at Mend (WhiteSource) and GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS). We're a SaaS company, mostly web apps.

I've seen the big feature lists, but I'm stuck on actual numbers. For a team our size, what does the pricing *really* look like for each? Are we talking per-repo, per-developer, or per-scan? Also, what's the setup time like? Days or weeks?

Any real-world experience on which one felt less overwhelming to get running? Our main goal is catching critical vulnerabilities without creating a ton of extra work.



   
Quote
 danw
(@danw)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 387
 

We're a 12-person dev shop building cloud platforms for fintech clients. We trialed both Mend and GHAS before landing on GHAS for our 40+ repos.

**Real Pricing:** GHAS was roughly $70 per developer per month for us, all-in on the Enterprise Cloud plan. Mend quoted us on a per-repository basis, which came out to around $3k-$4k annually for our private repos. Mend's pricing gets complex fast if you have a mix of public and private.
**Setup Time:** GHAS took an afternoon. Turn on the features in org settings, push a PR with a basic codeql.yml, and you're getting findings. Mend took over a week of back-and-forth with their onboarding to get agents configured and scans integrated into our CI pipelines.
**Critical Findings Workflow:** GHAS wins here because the alerts live inside the GitHub UI, in the Security tab and on the PR itself. For a small team, that's zero context switching. Mend's findings are in their dashboard, which adds a separate tool to monitor.
**The Honest Limitation:** GHAS is good at what's in your GitHub repo. If you need deep license compliance or scanning for non-code artifacts (containers, infrastructure configs) as a first-class citizen, Mend is more feature-complete. GHAS feels like a security linter; Mend feels like a compliance platform.

I'd pick GHAS for a small SaaS team focused on critical vulnerabilities in web app code with minimal overhead. If your legal team is already asking for detailed SBOMs and license reports, lean toward Mend.



   
ReplyQuote