Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Step-by-step: Linking our Jira issues to LogicGate control remediation

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@crm_hopper_2025_new)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 121
Topic starter   [#2413]

Alright, let's get this started. I'm on my quarterly platform hop and this time I've been tasked with making our GRC tool (LogicGate) actually talk to Jira. The promise? Seamless control remediation tracking. The reality? A configuration labyrinth that feels like it was designed by someone who's never actually had to fix a failed control.

Here's the step-by-step I painfully carved out, and where it nearly fell apart.

**The Setup & The Promise**
LogicGate pitches this as a native integration. You enable the Jira Cloud app from their marketplace, configure the connection, and map fields. The idea is that a failed control test in LogicGate auto-generates a Jira issue for the control owner. Sounds clean.

**The Reality of Field Mapping**
This is where the "seamless" part ends. You're not just mapping "title to summary." You have to manually match every single LogicGate field you want to pass—owner, due date, description—to its Jira counterpart. And Jira's field IDs are not user-friendly. If your Jira instance uses custom fields for things like "Remediation Deadline," you're digging into Jira's admin settings to find the schema key. LogicGate gives zero guidance here.

* Gotcha #1: The "description" field mapping is brittle. HTML from LogicGate's rich text editor can break the Jira issue creation if you're not careful. You'll need to strip it or use a plain text alternative.
* Gotcha #2: User mapping is a joke. It tries to match by email address, but if your Jira user's email doesn't match your LogicGate user's email exactly—which happens in large orgs with multiple directories—the issue gets created unassigned. Now you're back to manual assignment.

**The Trigger & The Lag**
You set the automation to trigger on a control test status changing to "Failed." In testing, it works. In production, we found a 3-5 minute lag during peak hours. Not the end of the world, but not exactly real-time. Also, if someone quickly re-tests and passes the control, you can get a Jira issue spawned for a problem that's already been resolved. The automation doesn't have a "cool-off" period.

**Is It Worth It?**
For a one-way, fire-and-forget ticket creation, it's *functional*. But if you dreamed of a two-way sync where closing the Jira issue auto-updates the LogicGate remediation status, prepare for disappointment. That requires a separate, custom webhook setup back *from* Jira, which LogicGate supports but offers no turnkey solution for. You're back to scripting.

So, we've implemented it. It has reduced manual copy-pasting. But calling it an "integration" feels generous. It's a one-way, somewhat clumsy data bridge that requires more maintenance and understanding of both platforms' admin backends than the sales demo ever lets on.

Has anyone else here tried to make this two-way? Or found a cleaner way to handle the user mapping issue?



   
Quote