Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Has anyone built a custom connector to pull data from AWS?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@billyj)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 137
Topic starter   [#17203]

I've been conducting a thorough evaluation of LogicGate's platform capabilities, particularly focusing on its extensibility and integration patterns for cloud-native environments. A recurring theme in my workflow analysis is the need to automate the ingestion of operational and compliance data from AWS services—such as CloudTrail logs, Config rules findings, and Security Hub alerts—directly into LogicGate for governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) workflows. While the platform offers several native integrations and a generic REST API connector, the documentation on building a custom, sustained data pull from AWS appears to be more conceptual than prescriptive.

My initial approach involved testing the REST API connector against the AWS SDK (via Lambda) and the AWS service endpoints directly. However, I encountered several architectural considerations that merit discussion:

* **Authentication and Secret Management:** Handling IAM roles, access keys, or temporary security credentials securely within LogicGate's connector framework is non-trivial. Storing secrets as plain text in connector configuration is an anti-pattern, but the alternatives (e.g., using a dedicated secrets manager with a proxy service) add significant complexity.
* **Polling Strategy and Rate Limiting:** AWS APIs have well-documented throttling limits. A robust connector must implement intelligent polling, exponential backoff, and checkpointing to avoid missed events and manage costs associated with API calls. LogicGate's scheduler for automated connectors needs to be coordinated with this.
* **Data Transformation and Normalization:** The raw JSON payloads from services like Security Hub or Config must be mapped to LogicGate's expected object model (e.g., Records, Fields). This often requires a significant intermediary transformation layer, which could reside in a dedicated translation service (like an AWS Lambda function) or within the connector's logic itself, if the platform's expression language is sufficiently powerful.

I am particularly interested in hearing from anyone who has implemented a production-grade solution for this. Which pattern proved most maintainable?

* A serverless middleware (e.g., AWS Lambda triggered by EventBridge, which then posts to LogicGate's Inbound Webhook)?
* A direct, scheduled LogicGate custom connector using a secured API gateway endpoint as a proxy to AWS services?
* Utilizing a third-party iPaaS (like Zapier or Workato) as an intermediary, despite the additional cost and potential latency?

Furthermore, any insights on handling large volumes of data, logging for connector diagnostics, and managing the lifecycle of such an integration would be invaluable. I am preparing a comparative analysis of integration methodologies for cloud APM and observability data into GRC platforms, and this use case is a critical component.

— Billy



   
Quote
(@gregr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 6 days ago
Posts: 83
 

You've zeroed in on the exact friction point. That secret management gap between LogicGate's configurable fields and AWS's IAM model is a real blocker. I tried a similar path and ended up with a proxy service, not because it was ideal, but because it was the only way to keep credentials out of the platform's UI.

A Lambda function with an attached IAM role becomes your secure endpoint; LogicGate's REST connector just needs to call its public URL (protected by a simple API Gateway token you *can* store). The Lambda then uses its runtime permissions to call AWS services. It adds operational overhead, but it shifts the security boundary where it belongs.

Have you looked at whether LogicGate's scheduled "polling" connector can handle the pagination and state tracking for something like a historical Security Hub pull? That's where I ran into my next wall.


throughput first


   
ReplyQuote
(@ellaj8)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 67
 

The secret management problem you hit isn't unique to LogicGate, it's a vendor platform design flaw. Storing AWS keys in any SaaS config field should fail your next audit.

The proxy Lambda pattern user1152 mentioned is the standard workaround, but it trades one problem for another. Now you're responsible for securing and maintaining that endpoint's availability, which LogicGate's SLA won't cover.

You can sometimes avoid the proxy by using AWS's native service integration with something like EventBridge to push findings to an SQS queue, then have LogicGate poll that. It moves the auth burden back to AWS where it belongs, but then you're relying on LogicGate's polling connector to be reliable, which is its own gamble.


Trust but verify – and audit


   
ReplyQuote