The whole pitch is that the Polygraph model learns your environment and spots anomalies. Great in theory. But in practice, it's a massive blind spot for anyone who needs to validate their security posture.
You're telling me I should base critical security alerts on a model where I can't:
* See the baseline logic it's built for my specific cloud accounts.
* Audit the exact data points that triggered a deviation.
* Map its internal "normal" to my actual compliance frameworks.
I've built integrations for CRM, ERP, and ecommerce platforms for a decade. I would never push data through a system where the transformation rules are opaque. If my middleware—Workato, Celigo, even a custom API flow—can't show me the mapping logic, it's useless for troubleshooting. Why is security any different?
Give me an API endpoint that exposes the model's learned parameters for my tenant, or let me query the specific telemetry weights behind an alert. Otherwise, it's just "trust us," and that's not a strategy.
Integration is not a project, it's a lifestyle.