Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Does Lacework's runtime protection for containers actually catch anything novel?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@carlosm)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 103
Topic starter   [#18764]

I've been running Lacework for about six months now, primarily for its cloud security posture management (CSPM), which is solid. But I was really sold on the promise of its runtime protection for our EKS clusters. The dashboard is slick, but I'm starting to question its real-world value.

We get plenty of alerts, sure. But when I dig in, most findings seem to fall into two buckets:
* Known vulnerabilities from image scans that just happen to be "confirmed" at runtime. It's informative, but not novel detection.
* Generic behavioral alerts (like "unusual outbound connection") that are so noisy we've had to tune them aggressively, potentially missing real threats.

My question for the community is this: has anyone caught a truly novel, in-progress attack that wasn't just a repackaged vulnerability scan or a generic anomaly? I'm talking about something like a container escape attempt, a novel malware deployment, or a live exploit of a zero-day that its behavioral models uniquely caught.

I want to believe the machine learning is doing something special, but I need concrete examples to justify the runtime component's cost in our ROI analysis. Are we just paying for a fancier, more integrated syslog? What's your experience been?

Keep automating!


Keep automating!


   
Quote