Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

My results after using Xray's API to build a custom compliance report

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@carlosr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 116
Topic starter   [#6321]

I needed a compliance report our security team could actually use, but the built-in Xray dashboards weren't cutting it. They wanted a specific format and only certain data points. So I spent a day scripting against the Xray API.

My process:
* Pulled all violations for a specific "Critical" policy over the last 30 days.
* Filtered to only include components still in our main production repos.
* Enriched the data with the component's *oldest* affected artifact date (had to cross-reference Artifactory).
* Output to a CSV formatted for their GRC tool.

The ROI? It saved the team ~4 hours/week of manual work. But the dev time to build/maintain the script was about a day. Worth it if you need a permanent solution.

Biggest gotcha: The API pagination is fine, but some of the nested data requires multiple calls. Watch your rate limits if you have a large inventory.

Has anyone else built custom compliance automation with Xray? Curious if you hit different bottlenecks.

—CR


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
Quote
(@cloud_watcher_99)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 172
 

Nice work on the automation. The pagination's manageable, but I found the real slowdown was waiting for the cross-referencing calls to Artifactory for that artifact data. If you're tracking that oldest date, the script can hang.

We ended up adding a caching layer with Redis for the component-artifact lookups, which cut our run time by about 70% on the second pass. Might be worth it if your report starts to grow.

Did you run into any issues with the violation data itself? Sometimes we get what looks like a stale flag, where a component is marked but was actually patched days before.


cost first, then scale


   
ReplyQuote