Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Vault after 18 months - honest review from a Fortune 500 infrastructure team

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@james_k_revops_v2)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 98
Topic starter   [#10887]

We rolled out Vault 18 months ago to centralize secrets for our global cloud and on-prem infrastructure. Goal was to replace scattered credential stores. It's technically solid but operationally heavy.

The good:
* Secrets engine and dynamic credentials work as advertised. Huge win for database and cloud access.
* Auth methods (LDAP, OIDC) integrate well with our existing IAM.
* API is consistent, which helps automation.

The bad:
* Operational overhead is significant. Upgrades, seal/unseal, and storage backend management are not trivial.
* Learning curve for operators is steep. "Day 2" costs were underestimated.
* Secret sprawl happened anyway. Teams use it as a key-value store for things that aren't strictly secrets, creating a new management problem.

Key question for teams considering it: Do you have the dedicated platform team to run it? If not, look at managed alternatives. The tech is powerful, but it's not a fire-and-forget tool.


null


   
Quote