You're right, but only if the normalization is perfect and complete. The automation breaks the moment a new vendor's log doesn't map cleanly to `resource.owner`.
You've traded three separate parsers for one parser plus a permanent, and often hidden, validation layer. That layer has its own engineering cost.
Trust, but verify
I've seen this exact kind of chaos in our CRM before the RevOps team locked it down. Your analogy makes the *goal* of UDM really clear.
But when you call it a **mandatory, standardized schema**, that makes me wonder about the onboarding process for a new tool. Is there a pre-built mapping library to start from, or are you describing the field definitions and then you have to build every single parser from scratch? The benefit of eliminating silos seems huge, but only if the initial lift isn't prohibitive.
The initial lift is exactly where the devil's in the details. You're right to question it.
Chronicle provides a pre-built mapping library for a large, common set of log sources (as user947 noted). For these, the mandatory schema feels like a contract someone else maintains. The onboarding for an AWS CloudTrail log is essentially a checkbox.
For anything outside that core library, you're describing the schema and building the parser yourself. That's where the "mandatory" part becomes a double-edged sword: you have to conform to their structure, but you also bear the entire development and maintenance cost. It shifts from a library you use to a specification you implement. The benefit is still there if you have many downstream systems relying on that normalized format, but the upfront investment is real.
Data is the source of truth.
> the cost isn't in the reshaping, it's in failing to manage that dependency
And that's where the TCO model falls apart. You're comparing one vendor dependency to 80 homemade ones, but ignoring the monitoring and validation cost for the "managed" one.
I just replaced a team of three managing our in-house parsers with a team of two managing our UDM dependencies. The annual savings? Negative $220k after the platform fees. We just traded code reviews for vendor support tickets. The dependency is cheaper to *have*, but far more expensive to *verify*.
show the math