Skip to content
Migrated from Carbo...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Migrated from Carbon Black to SentinelOne - 3 month deployment lessons

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@devops_grunt)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 159
Topic starter   [#5565]

Just wrapped up a 12,000-endpoint migration from VMware Carbon Black (Cloud) to SentinelOne. The business case was cost and the promise of better EDR telemetry, but the technical migration was its own special kind of hell. We're a mixed shop: 70% AWS EC2 (Linux/Windows), 20% physical datacenter, 10% containerized workloads on EKS. If you're staring down a similar road, here's what I wish I'd known before we kicked off.

**The Uninstall/Install Problem at Scale**
Carbon Black's uninstall process via the API is straightforward, but you're left with a naked system. Our goal was sub-24-hour agent turnover to minimize exposure. We couldn't rely on user interaction. The solution was a two-phase pipeline using Ansible and some grim, battle-tested scripts.

Phase 1: Inventory and uninstall. We pulled a dynamic inventory from our CMDB, filtered for groups, and ran a playbook that:
* Called the CB API to uninstall the agent
* Waited 60 seconds, then forcibly removed remnants (services, drivers, files)
* Logged every outcome to a timestamped file for audit

```yaml
# ansible/playbooks/cb_uninstall.yml (excerpt)
- name: Force remove CB remnants on Windows
win_shell: |
Stop-Service -Name "CbDefense" -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
sc.exe delete "CbDefense"
Remove-Item -Path "C:Program FilesConfer" -Recurse -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
when: ansible_os_family == "Windows_NT"
ignore_errors: yes
```

Phase 2: SentinelOne install. We used S1's "deep visibility" installer, pushed via the same Ansible runner, but keyed off a custom attribute in our inventory that marked the host as "cleaned." The install command had to be wrapped in a try/catch for our CI to handle failures gracefully.

**The Biggest Surprise: Resource Contention**
SentinelOne's "network quarantine" feature on Linux is brutal. If it flags something, it can completely sever network connectivity. We had several false positives on legacy internal apps that caused immediate, silent outages. The fix was aggressive policy tuning upfront, but we had to build an exception process on the fly. Lesson: Run the S1 agent in Monitor-only mode for a full sprint on your most critical, weirdest legacy systems before flipping to Protect.

**Policy as Code (Sort Of)**
SentinelOne's console is fine, but we manage everything as code. We used their API to export baseline policies, templatized them with `jq`, and version-controlled them. Any change goes through a PR and is applied via a pipeline. Here's a snippet of how we set a core policy flag via API call in our deployment script:

```bash
# bash/s1_policy_update.sh
POLICY_ID=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: ApiToken ${S1_API_TOKEN}"
"${S1_DOMAIN}/web/api/v2.1/policies" | jq -r '.data[] | select(.name=="Linux_Servers").id')

curl -X POST -H "Authorization: ApiToken ${S1_API_TOKEN}"
-H "Content-Type: application/json"
-d '{
"data": {
"networkQuarantine": {
"enabled": false
}
}
}'
"${S1_DOMAIN}/web/api/v2.1/policies/${POLICY_ID}"
```

**Kubernetes (EKS) Integration**
This was smoother than expected. We deployed the S1 Helm chart as a DaemonSet, but had to customize the resource limits heavily. The default settings caused CPU throttling on some of our smaller worker nodes. We ended up with these values:

```yaml
# helm/values/s1-agent.yaml
resources:
limits:
cpu: "300m"
memory: "500Mi"
requests:
cpu: "100m"
memory: "200Mi"
# Also critical: set affinity to avoid nodes with specific taints
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
operator: NotIn
values:
- t3.nano
- t3.micro
```

**Overall Takeaways**
* **Telemetry is richer**, but the volume is insane. Plan your Splunk/Elastic SIEM ingestion costs accordingly.
* **The console is faster** than CB's, but the API is quirky. Idempotency isn't always guaranteed.
* **Deployment at scale is a logistics problem**, not a technical one. Your success hinges on clean inventory and phased rollouts.
* **Threat hunting is more intuitive** with the deep activity timeline, but your SOC will need training to move away from CB's event-based model.

Biggest regret: not building a canary group with our most complex, fragile servers first. We assumed "standard web servers" were the best test bed, but the real chaos lived on a few ancient, in-house app servers.


Automate everything. Twice.


   
Quote
(@devops_dad_v2)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 122
 

I'm a platform engineering lead at a fintech with around 8,000 nodes, running a similar mix of AWS, on-prem metal, and GKE. We've been on SentinelOne for two years after evaluating both it and Carbon Black Cloud.

* **Cost model predictability:** SentinelOne was a flat per-endpoint price, period. In my last shop, Carbon Black Cloud's SaaS model started around $45/endpoint/year but had usage-based elements for certain telemetry that could swing 15-20%. For a fixed budget, S1's simplicity won.
* **Agent resource footprint:** This was the deciding factor for our data center workloads. On our Windows Servers, Carbon Black's sensor consistently used 1.5-2% CPU and 250-300MB RAM. SentinelOne's static average was under 1% and 180MB. That savings sounds trivial until you multiply it across thousands of hosts.
* **Deployment and configuration drift:** SentinelOne's policy inheritance and grouping is more logical. Carbon Black's policy application felt brittle; we'd see machines fall out of groups after a domain change. S1's kernel module update process is also more graceful. We've had zero forced reboots in two years, whereas CB required three in the 18 months prior.
* **EDR telemetry and query speed:** For raw data, Carbon Black's API is richer. For *actionable* threat hunting, SentinelOne's UI is faster. The difference is query latency: complex joins on 30 days of CB data could take minutes. The same hunt in S1, using their pre-linked data model, returns in under 30 seconds. You trade some flexibility for speed.

If your primary needs are cost certainty, predictable performance on resource-constrained servers, and fast threat-hunting in the console, I'd pick SentinelOne. If you're building a custom detection pipeline and need the most granular raw telemetry via API, Carbon Black Cloud might still be worth the premium. Tell me more about your team's primary workflow: are you mostly console-based hunters, or do you feed everything into a SIEM for custom correlation?



   
ReplyQuote