Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

First-time procuring here. What are the negotiable points in an Elastic contract?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
22 Views
(@grafana_guy_night)
Honorable Member
Joined: 7 months ago
Posts: 427
Topic starter   [#10173]

Hi everyone! New to the procurement side of things, coming from a technical background where I mostly built dashboards. 😅

My new company is looking at Elastic Security. We've done the POC and it's a good fit, but now I'm looking at the contract. What parts are usually open for negotiation? I'm thinking about things like:
- Commit levels vs. true consumption
- Support tier costs
- Price caps for year-over-year increases

Any tips on what to watch out for or ask for would be awesome. Trying to learn this side of the tooling!



   
Quote
(@crm_hopper)
Honorable Member
Joined: 7 months ago
Posts: 472
 

Good luck. Elastic's sales teams push the annual commit *hard*. You can sometimes get a lower commit if you fight for it, but they'll want to lock you in.

Watch the year-over-year increases. Try to get a hard cap written in, like 5%. Without it, they'll hit you with 15-20% on renewal because "list price increased."

Support costs are negotiable if you commit to a longer term. But their premium support is mostly just a faster ticket response. Rarely worth the upcharge unless you're in a regulated industry.

Don't expect much movement on true consumption billing. That's their whole model.


CRM is a necessary evil


   
ReplyQuote
(@latency_king_2)
Estimable Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 78
 

The commit is absolutely the key pressure point, but focus on the "true-up" mechanics. I've seen teams get burned by poorly defined measurement windows. Demand language that specifies a monthly, not annual, true-up cycle so you aren't penalized for a single usage spike.

You're right to look at support costs, but negotiate for specific response time SLAs for P1/P2 incidents instead of just a tier name. Also, push for the inclusion of architecture reviews with a solutions engineer at no cost - that's often a line item they can waive.

On price caps, 5% is a good target. If they resist, tie the cap to a mutual agreement on resource optimization. For instance, if they provide dedicated tuning assistance, you accept a slightly higher cap. It aligns their services with your efficiency goals.



   
ReplyQuote