Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Just got the quote - is the enterprise tier 3x the cost worth it?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@infra_skeptic_9)
Reputable Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 155
Topic starter   [#16079]

Alright, so the sales rep finally delivered the sacred scroll after three weeks of "I'll have to check with my manager on that pricing." We're looking at moving our on-prem secret sprawl (a delightful mix of HashiCorp Vault open source, some legacy Thycotic, and a handful of text files we don't talk about) into something with actual support and a unified pane of glass. Delinea's Platform (formerly Secret Server, I guess) is the contender.

The quote for their Enterprise tier is, and I'm not exaggerating, approximately three times the annual cost of the Pro tier. The feature comparison spreadsheet they sent is a masterpiece of enterprise-grade obscurity, full of checkmarks but light on tangible "why."

Before I go back to the finance committee and explain why we need to re-allocate the budget of a small department to store strings securely, I need to be convinced this isn't just a tax for features we'll never operationalize. The rep keeps hammering on "Dynamic Privileged Access" and "Cloud PAM," but when I peel back the marketing, it sounds like a fancier way to say "just-in-time access with some automation."

So, for those of you who actually went for the Enterprise tier over Pro:

* Is the integrated SSH key management and rotation actually something you use, or is it another module you bought that now requires a dedicated FTE to manage the playbooks? Show me a Terraform snippet or an Ansible role that *actually* hooks into their APIs for this. The Pro tier seems to handle the basic static SSH key storage, but the automation is the differentiator, allegedly.
* The "Advanced Session Monitoring" with video playback – in practice, is this useful for anything beyond compliance checkbox exercises? The storage and compute overhead for capturing *all* privileged sessions must be non-trivial. What's the real-world load like?
* Their "Cloud DevOps Secrets" engine – is it genuinely competitive with something like AWS Secrets Manager or even a well-managed Vault cluster for dynamic secrets? Or is it just a more expensive, proprietary wrapper that adds another layer of indirection? I'm looking at something like this Pro tier vs. Enterprise for a service account secret:

```yaml
# Pro: REST API call to retrieve a static secret. Simple.
engine: delinea_pro
secret_id: "prod/app/db_password"

# Enterprise: The promise is more like this?
engine: delinea_enterprise
secret_template: "dynamic_db_user"
parameters:
ttl: "2h"
db_instance: "prod-rds-001"
```

If that Enterprise example is just a conceptual dream and the reality is a clunky web UI with limited Terraform provider support, then it's a hard pass.

I'm fundamentally skeptical that the delta translates to operational value rather than just compliance coverage. Convince me I'm wrong. What failure mode did the Enterprise tier actually prevent, or what manual process did it *truly* automate away, that the Pro tier couldn't? Be specific, or don't bother.

-- cynical ops


Your k8s cluster is 40% idle.


   
Quote
(@charlie2)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 61
 

1. I'm a project manager at a mid-sized fintech, about 200 people, and we run Delinea Platform (Enterprise tier) in AWS to manage secrets for our microservices and database access. We migrated from a DIY HashiCorp Vault setup about a year ago.

2.
**Real cost drivers:** Our enterprise quote wasn't just user-based. The big jump came from the number of secrets and applications we manage (over 15k) and the required high-availability nodes. For us, it was about $45k/year over Pro, but we needed the secret volume.
**Deployment and integration effort:** The enterprise deployment took two weeks with Delinea's support, mostly for setting up the DR site and SAML integrations. Pro would've been a few days. The agent for automatic secret rotation on our RDS instances was simpler in enterprise.
**Where it clearly wins:** Dynamic Privileged Access actually meant we could set up just-in-time, role-based SSH access to production servers for engineers, with approvals automated in Slack. That cut our standing privileged accounts by about 70%. Pro tier only allows scheduled or manual access.
**Support and response:** Enterprise got us a named TAM and 1-hour SLA for critical issues. When we had a sync delay between nodes, they were on a call in 20 minutes. Pro tier support, from our trial period, was next-business-day.

3. I'd pick Enterprise if you have over 10k secrets, need automated just-in-time access workflows, or have a compliance requirement for true active-active failover. To make a clean call, tell us how many secrets you're managing and whether your auditors require session recording for all privileged access.



   
ReplyQuote