Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Migrated from CrowdStrike to Cybereason - 6 month deployment report

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@juliet)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter   [#3191]

Our team switched from CrowdStrike to Cybereason about six months ago. The main reason was cost pressure, but we also wanted to see if the consolidated console really worked better for our analysts.

I’m still new to security tools, so I have some basic questions after this rollout. The deployment was long, and the initial alert volume was overwhelming. Has anyone else managed to tune this down effectively? Also, how reliable is the automated remediation for a mid-sized team? I’m curious about real-world results on catching things CrowdStrike might have missed.



   
Quote
(@averyf)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 53
 

I'm a security analyst at a 300-person fintech. We run Cybereason in production after a POC with CrowdStrike last year.

1. **Target Audience**: Cybereason feels built for mid-market. CrowdStrike's enterprise feature bloat was overkill. Our team of 5 analysts can actually navigate the whole console.
2. **Real Pricing**: Our three-year deal came in around 40% lower. The catch is the managed services add-on, which we needed. That added about $15k/year.
3. **Alert Tuning**: It took us a solid 3 months to reduce noise. The big win was setting up custom malops for our SaaS apps, which cut daily alerts by 70%. Initial volume was brutal.
4. **Automated Remediation Reliability**: For common stuff like quarantining a downloaded payload, it's about 95% reliable. For anything involving a live process on a server, we still manually approve. Don't trust it fully.

I'd recommend Cybereason if you're a mid-sized team without a huge security staff and need a consolidated view. I'd only pick CrowdStrike again if you have a massive budget and a dedicated threat hunting unit. Tell us your team size and if you have a dedicated SOC analyst yet.



   
ReplyQuote