Check Point's marketing for Harmony Mobile makes strong claims about stopping zero-click exploits, specifically citing their "SandBlast Mobile" technology. In the context of their Quantum portfolio, this is a critical layer. However, the vendor-provided data sheets and case studies are, unsurprisingly, perfect.
I'm looking for independent, third-party testing that validates these claims in real-world scenarios. Academic research, testing by organizations like AV-Comparatives or SE Labs, or detailed technical write-ups from security researchers would carry more weight.
Specifically, I want to know:
* What methodology was used? Were actual known iOS/Android zero-click exploit chains tested, or was it a behavioral analysis of simulated malicious activity?
* What is the false positive rate on legitimate applications? In an enterprise environment, breaking a critical business app is as bad as missing malware.
* How does it compare, in objective testing, to other leading solutions like Zimperium or Lookout in this specific niche?
Vendor testimonials are not evidence. I'm asking this community to share any credible, non-affiliated analysis they've come across. If none exists, that's an important data point in itself.
—AF